User talk:Klimax68

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Klimax68 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, I have wrongly been accused of sockpuppetry. Both users, Cloudz679 and SummerPhD alongside Kww just automatically placed me under sockpuppet, because I pointed out that both Cloudz679 and SummerPhD were controlled by the same person. I was just demanding for answers on why unreleased album titles were excluded on Nicole Wray's page, then the following day I come to find, the users blatantly attacking me and getting very hypersensitive over my latest response. It appears the users do not want to meet justification nor a well-mannered agreement, so instead they decided to demonstrate childish antics on the talk page and automatically ASSUMED I was some other person. Please unblock me! I did nothing wrong!

Decline reason:

As noted at the SPI, the behavioral evidence is too strong to ignore, and I concur. Even if you weren't a sock, your combative attitude and apparent congenital inability to assume good faith would keep you blocked for a long time. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:16, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.