Jump to content

User talk:KlementyNagorny

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2012

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nicholas II of Russia with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:03, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:KlementyNagorny, you may be blocked from editing. Widr (talk) 05:05, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Jim1138. Widr (talk) 05:05, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:11, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Loreen Dinwiddie

[edit]

Hello, KlementyNagorny,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Loreen Dinwiddie should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loreen Dinwiddie .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Weihang7 (talk) 14:06, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability notification

[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Bernice Madigan, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Bernice Madigan" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 14:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elsie Thompson for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elsie Thompson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elsie Thompson (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bernice Madigan for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bernice Madigan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernice Madigan (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

(t · c) buidhe 13:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]