User talk:Kldesperado

Welcome!

February 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kldesperado (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I respectfully request the unblocking of my Wikipedia account, User: Kldesperado. I am committed to following Wikipedia's guidelines and contributing constructively to the community. Kldesperado (talk) 6:56 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kldesperado (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my account was blocked due to edits that were deemed promotional and in violation of Wikipedia's guidelines. I acknowledge that my contributions may have crossed the line into promotional territory, and I apologize for any disruption caused.

Moving forward, I am committed to adhering strictly to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Specifically, I will ensure that my edits maintain a neutral point of view, are verifiable from reliable sources, and contribute positively to the encyclopedia's content.

In order to rectify my past actions and contribute constructively to Wikipedia, I plan to focus on the following:

Conduct thorough research before making edits, ensuring that all information added is accurate, neutral, and properly sourced.

Avoid any edits that could be perceived as promotional or biased in favor of a particular viewpoint or entity.

Collaborate with other Wikipedia editors to seek feedback and guidance on my contributions, learning from their expertise and experience.

Remain open to constructive criticism and willing to make necessary revisions or corrections to my edits based on community feedback.

I am eager to continue contributing to Wikipedia in a manner that aligns with its principles and values. I respectfully request that my account be unblocked so that I may have the opportunity to demonstrate my commitment to upholding Wikipedia's standards.

Thank you for your consideration. Kldesperado (talk) 02:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Chatbot generated requests are not accepted. (scored 98% likely) We want to hear from you, not a bot, as it's not the bot that is blocked but you. Chatbot generated requests cannot speak to your specific situation. Your request does not need to be gramatically and stylistically perfect- just talk to us. 331dot (talk) 09:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kldesperado (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand your concern about the chatbot generated request. I apologize for the confusion. I assure you, I am the person behind the blocked account. Iam committed to resolve this issue and contribute positively to Wikipedia. I acknowledge my mistakes and promise to follow Wikipedia's rules moving forward. Please reconsider the yblock on my account so that I can continue contributing.Thank you. Kldesperado (talk) 11:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This one's still chatbot generated. Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:37, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, Kldesperado,

What sort of articles would you like to work on that have nothing to do with Akhil J Madhu? Your account was blocked because it seemed devoted to promotional editing so what other subjects are you interested in that have no likelihood that you are being compensated to editing them? That's one question you've been asked and not responded to. Wikipedia has no use for editors who are here to promote a person or company. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kldesperado (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I do understand that my account was blocked because my edits might have appeared promotional, especially related to some specific person. I did not mean this to happen and I see how it could be viewed that way. Moving forward, will try to focus on making neutral edits based on reliable source and aslo will follow Wikipedia guidelines more closely, and contribute to a variety of topics including history, science, and culture. I plan to work on improving articles about historical events, updating scientific discoveries,Personalities and enhancing content on cultural practices. I hope you can give me some other chance to contribute appropriately. Thanks

Decline reason:

You got the GPTZero score down significantly by just changing a few words and inserting a typo. But the fact remains that this was mostly generated by an AI. The difference between Special:Diff/1239658546 and Special:Diff/1239662485 is night and day. It's obvious you're using AI to communicate with us. Since you can't communicate effectively in English without machine assistance, and you're probably lying about your use of AI, I've revoked your talk page access. There's no reason we should be spending this much time arguing with a spammer. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:54, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This request scored 76% chance of being AI generated. Are you unable to communicate with us without using an AI? 331dot (talk) 17:49, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 331dot, I am still astonished by sseing the reply from you guys that the request is still AI generated. But still u mentioned that its just CHANCE. So now you can confirm that the request is not AI genetaed or Bot generated, the reply was manually done by me. Kldesperado (talk) 18:05, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can use GPTZero yourself and see exactly what we're seeing. Then you can spend the time to modify your request so that it doesn't look like any of it is chatbot generated. Or you can just write it by hand, But we're not going to accept unblock requests that have sentences that appear 100% AI generated. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:27, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you know, these platforms only provide some assumptions which may be real or sometimes completely wrong. Also, I have modified my request. So please have a look Kldesperado (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.