User talk:Klaysaurus

Warnings

Civility

Hello, I'm Wjemather. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Jimmymci234 that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 13:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speculation

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Matthew Fitzpatrick has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 13:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Matthew Fitzpatrick shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 13:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to CME Group Tour Championship has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 19:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2021 European Tour, you may be blocked from editing.

As discussed previously, do not pre-empt tournament finishes. Per WP:CRYSTAL, you must wait for the tournament to finish before updating articles. Regards. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 12:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not an oracle. If you continue to update articles with predictions of future results, you may be blocked from editing. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 12:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the information as soon as I got confirmation from where I'm at. What seems to be the problem this time?

You know what the problem is; it has been made plain to you on several occasions. Waiting until the last group reach the final hole is not confirmation, even if one of them has a big lead; you must wait for them to finish. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 13:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now you are just being beyond unreasonable my guy. I understand the issue before when I was updating info at hole 14 or sth. And I have recognised that mistake. But to put in the information literally 2 mins before the final result when any reasonable golf follower would realise the result is beyond doubt and is final? Either you have decided to target me, or you are nitpicking at nothing. Loosen up a little. Cheers

Wikipedia policies—Verifiability, No original research and What Wikipedia is not (a crystal ball)—are not negotiable. If you cannot, or refuse to, abide by them you will be blocked. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 13:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That wikipedia policy is to deter predictions. I am not predicting, I am updating the correct information when the end result is beyond any reasonable doubt. If any of my edits were predictions, please show me where I have done such edits and I will cordially address it. Till you can show me that, I am certain I am not committing any violation of any wikipedia policies. If you still feel otherwise, I'll be more than glad to appeal. Thanks again my guy. And again, loosen up a little. Cheers.

Have it your way. Next time, I will report your actions to the appropriate administrators noticeboard. You have been duly warned. _wjemather^{please leave a message...}

Sure thing. You must be super fun at parties.

Edit warring, again

Your recent editing history at Patrick Reed shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 23:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--_wjemather^{please leave a message...} 23:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at 2020–21 PGA Tour shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 21:46, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 22:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks at the edit warring noticeboard

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 02:23, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to 2020 FIBA Men's Olympic Qualifying Tournaments – Victoria has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 00:28, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 FIBA Men's Olympic Qualifying Tournaments – Victoria, you may be blocked from editing. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 00:33, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]