User talk:Klausrohwer

I have recommended

…rejection of your new article, as violating a wide variety of WP policies and guidelines. See the Talk section at that page, and the tags that have been added. Note that the added tags should not be removed by you, unless the issue are thoroughly addressed. (Every fact appearing that is not common knowledge must be supported by citation, this technological advance must be established based on reviews and book chapters written by professors other than the one with which you collaborate, and the primary source-claims, regarding "first-to-propose," -develop, etc. must be based on the descriptions of others, not self-serving claims made in patents and primary research reports.)

I have suggested to the reviewer that they present you with an example of a good article. Meanwhile, I would recommend you WITHDRAW the article, and resubmit a single paragraph, each sentence sourced from secondary sources (reviews, textbooks, review chapters, no patents or primary sources). Explain the technology, its origin in other established technology, and find persons other that the Professor claiming first-to-discover that state he was first to discover.

Bottom line, business are not allowed to promote their discoveries or products on WP, nor are professors allowed to self-promote here. This is an encyclopedia, presenting the preponderance of scientific and other academic opinions—and not an extension of professorial or business web pages. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 00:52, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: INFITEC 3D method (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:INFITEC 3D method and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 13:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Klausrohwer, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! » Shadowowl | talk 13:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:INFITEC 3D method

Hello, Klausrohwer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "INFITEC 3D method".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 01:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]