User talk:Kkmcbride

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! RJaguar3 | u | t 19:42, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:16, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Semantics of School Age Bullying

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Semantics of School Age Bullying. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Sematics of bullying. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Sematics of bullying - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 18:18, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Semiotics of bullying....

Hi KK McBride, I had to delete the section you inserted regarding the "Semiotics" of bullying for some of the following reasons:

Much of the wording was frankly quite confusing. For example, you wrote, "According to Hermogenes, the word 'bully' is a linguistic sign based on the relationship between the word and what it represents." Now the word "Bully" did not exist in the time of Hermogenes, yet your assertion here strongly implies that Hermogenes specifically discussed or wrote about the word. You may have meant something else here, but I don't know for sure. A good edit shouldn't force a reader to have to do mental summersaults to try to figure out what exactly, you really meant. This sentence, and many other similar sentences in the former "Semiotics" section were simply confusing.
Many of the facts that you summarized in this section were already covered in other sections of the Bullying article, making your repetition of these facts a difficult read for a typical reader. For example, you wrote that, "Bully's are able to gain power over individuals and is usually associated with an imbalance of power." Now in this sentence, not only is there poor grammar usage, but the fact that bullying is associated with an imbalance of power is redundant, as it is already mentioned in the article lead.
Your footnotes were often redundant (you need to use ibid type references whenever two different references within a Wikipedia article refer to the same reference article).

The "Semiotics" section that you added seemed to be primarily about Katherine Liepe-Levinson's and Martin H. Levinson's "General Semantics" approach to dealing with bullying. While the "General Semantics" approach to the bullying problem may deserve some brief discussion in the article, whatever reference to it is made in the article would best be brief, pithy and to the point, and probably should not bloat the article by an additional 30%, since I don't think that 30% of bullying research these days is related to the "General Semantics" approach to bullying. I hope that you might be able to reduce your Semiotics section down to perhaps one simple well written and properly footnoted paragraph.

I know this may seem like asking a lot of you, but I think you could do this if you tried, and I would be willing to try to help you with this if you wanted.

Thanks, Scott P. (talk) 23:30, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]