User talk:Kjgm

December 2020

Hello, I'm Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tox (protocol) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 01:34, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Jitsi. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 01:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Tox (protocol), you may be blocked from editing. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 02:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Comparison of instant messaging protocols. Cairo2k18 • (talk) • (contribs) 06:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Can you please stop adding incorrect and unsourced information to articles? You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, it's very easy or even automatic to add citations if you're citing a webpage, you just need the URL. – Thjarkur (talk) 17:17, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jami (software), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 03:03, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tox (protocol), you may be blocked from editing. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 00:35, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jami (software). Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 01:31, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020: Conflict of interest regarding Jami

You recently announced on the Teahouse that you are the developer of this software, whose article you are editing.
Hello, Kjgm. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.--Quisqualis (talk) 07:11, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Tox (protocol) is developed by volunteers and is not a company or any other legal organization. Jami (software) is developed by Savoir-faire Linux. As far as I can tell, there is no "Tox,Inc", and even if there is, they do not have anything to do with these 2 articles. Please stop inserting obviously false information. Thank you. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 12:16, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jami (software), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 11:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For the final time, Jami (software) is not owned by Tox,Inc or this Augusto person. Tox (protocol) is not owned by Tox,Inc or this Augusto person. Jitsi is not owned by Tox,Inc or this Augusto person. I'm not sure if this is about getting false credit or just a joke, but either way, it has went on long enough. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 12:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 13:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1055#Kjgm

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fences&Windows 18:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

UTRS decline

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please see UTRS appeal #40945

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:10, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]