User talk:Kiwi8

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 202.156.10.13 lifted or expired. Request handled by: Yamla 20:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Calvin Cheng

Calvin Cheng was never personally fined by the CCS. The judgement also clearly said that AMIP was not a party to the infringement; the individual companies were. Please read the judgement. Do not continue posting libel.

"The CCS relies on the decision of the UK Court of Appeal in 848way Stores Limited grid Others v Twigger and Others [2010] EWCA Civ 1472 in which the Court held that the Act only imposes liability on the undertaking and not on individuals (such as directors)". - From the CCS judgement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aricialam (talk • contribs) 17:41, 9 January 2015 (UTC) These are facts — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aricialam (talk • contribs) 17:26, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

USA Time

There's no such thing as USA Time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tunakdud (talk • contribs) 01:49, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, changed it to EDT (Washington time) Kiwi8 04:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Usa Time

u fixed it! Tunakdud 03:15, 13 October 2007 (UTC) yay![reply]

Improving Zelda II: The Adventure of Link to Featured Article status

I am working on improving Zelda II: The Adventure of Link to Featured Article status and noticed that you have made substantial contributions to the article. If you have time, I would be delighted if you could help with this endeavor. Thanks in advance! Gary King (talk) 21:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The guidelines are set out at WP:WIAFA. Gary King (talk) 06:06, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I see you helped create the Aeroplane Chess page. I gotta a quick question. You said that if you land on another player's planes and you have less planes than them, you must move one step forward, right? Well, what happens if the space in front of you is the flying line (shortcut/fold line)? Do I fly across? Thanks! And if you could please, answer on my talk page--☆Tavis ource 03:31, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jones in the Fast Lane

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jones in the Fast Lane, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

A search for references has failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources in order to comply with notability requirements. This has included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:

Jones in the Fast Lane – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rogerb67 (talk) 01:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jones in the Fast Lane

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jones in the Fast Lane, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jones in the Fast Lane. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rogerb67 (talk) 23:16, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jones in the Fast Lane

You are nuts for asking me to find for you game magazines that I had 18 years ago, which I had since thrown them away. You are just being bureaucratic here.
— Kiwi8

Please try to remember to remain civil and assume good faith in discussions. Thanks. --Rogerb67 (talk) 14:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am already being as civil as I can already. It could be worse. Kiwi8 (talk) 01:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

message — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.183.207.61 (talk) 18:31, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore

Hello Kiwi! I have noticed you are from Singapore and you seem to be a sport fan. Can I ask you if you support Singapore in all sports, and in particular in Olympic sports? The best thing would be also in sports in which Singapore is not so good at, but still have athletes at international level

If you do, I would like to talk about an Olympic Games project in which I would really like to have a Singapore user in.

Let me know in your talk page, I will have a look in next days and I will try to answer as soon as possible.

Thanks! OrecoMozo Ttlmp2011 (talk) 18:57, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm interested, but it'll still have to depend on the specifics of the jobscope. :) Kiwi8 (talk) 11:02, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Next match day scenarios

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Next match day scenarios. Jack Bornholm (talk) 21:07, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore meetup invitation

Singapore Meetup

Meetup 6

Status: Planning
Date: 4 September 2012

Please indicate your interest on the meetup page.

v • d • e

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Tuesday evening (4 September). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Singapore 6. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 00:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Singapore)

October 2012 Singapore meetup invitation

Singapore Meetup

Meetup 7

Status: Confirmed
Date: Wednesday, 31 October 2012
Time: 7:30 pm
Place: Singapore Hackerspace

Please indicate your interest on the meetup page.

v • d • e

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup on Wednesday the 31st of October. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Singapore 7. Hope you can make it. JVbot (talk) 04:07, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Singapore)

Next matchday scenarios

Hello! I invite you to a new discussion on the matter: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Next matchday scenarios. Ivan Volodin (talk) 21:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Sorry for disturbing you again. Thank you for participating in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Next matchday scenarios and for your support. I have proposed a conclusion that addresses the concerns of many participants regarding reliable sources. Would appreciate a comment. Ivan Volodin (talk) 10:41, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Conclusion? Ivan Volodin (talk) 14:49, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Ban Chi Board.SVG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:46, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kiwi8. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kiwi8. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aeroplane Chess

The article Aeroplane Chess has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Board Game Geek is not a reliable source. No in-depth sources about the game located. Best source I found was this children's book about games, which isn't a great source. Chinese Wikipedia article doesn't have much better sourcing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:02, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]