User talk:Kived

August 2018

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pandyan dynasty without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The content you removed is reliably sourced -- please explain on the talk page why you think it's wrong, and please provide a source for your assertion. utcursch | talk 20:03, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changes in pandya dynasty

Greetings,

There is no evidence that the language sanskrit is used (officially) in pallava dynasty during that period. They used Brahmi, Tamil. Pallava dynasty is famous for their trading with other countries. But the language is only Tamil Brahmi and letters are Vattezhutthu. Hence the previous information is wrong and that needs to be corrected.

Thanks Kived Kived (talk) 20:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have seen the same mistakes in other south Indian dynasties like pallava and so on. I would like to correct that pages also.

Thanks Kived

This is not true. The Pandyas used both Sanskrit and Tamil in their inscriptions (see Velvikudi inscription for example). So did the Pallavas - see this for example. utcursch | talk 15:56, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]