User talk:Kitzer1200

Welcome!

Hello, Kitzer1200, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Will Beback talk 23:53, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution

Is this the same editor as user:Royal5646? If so then it'd be helpful to stick to one account. If not then welcome aboard. The first step in dispute resolution is discussion on the related article's talk page. Another place to discuss issues with biographies is the Biographies of living people noticeboard. If you like, I can start a thread there and you can explain your issues. A wide range of experienced Wikipedia editors participate there, so it's a good place to solicit opinions. Will Beback talk 23:53, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your welcome. I am not the Royal user you referenced. I am concerned that twenty years or more of Mr. Benton's most recent history was deleted and more credibility was given to obscure press clippings concerning Larouche's organization in the 1980s than was given to more recent news coverage of Mr. Benton, including 18 years of the Falls Church News Press. The 20 years of biography that was deleted by another user contained previously Wikipedia-verified information concerning Mr. Benton's many awards and commendations, and his recognition as a business leader by the Falls Church business community, the City of Falls Church government, and the DC gay community. I ask that all revisions to this page be halted until the issue of why this information was deleted, and why numerous attempts to reinstate this information appear not to have been allowed. Thank you again.

Kitzer1200 (talk) 00:24, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Please see Talk:Nicholas F. Benton#wanton deletions and additions for the thread started by user:Royal5646. I just posted a comment there. Will Beback talk 00:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just blanking material is not acceptable. If a newspaper runs a profile of a person who disagrees with it, is it appropriate for him to go to newstands and destroy the issues that contain it? No, the appropriate response is to talk to the editors and ask for corrections to be made. Please cooperate so we can achieve an outcome that's acceptable to all. Will Beback talk 20:46, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nicholas F. Benton, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nicholas F. Benton was changed by Kitzer1200 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-10-16T19:33:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:33, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note, the deletion of Nicholas F. Benton's page is not "wanton deletion" or "vandalism." This was done at Mr. Benton's request. Wikipedia may have been a good idea at one time, but it appears to have lost its vision and become a defacto blog for those who believe their version of history is the correct one. I repeat, the portions of Mr. Benton's biography that were vandalized by others were portions already verified by Wikipedia. Enough is enough. Please respect Mr. Benton's wishes and shut down this page. Kitzer1200 (talk) 19:43, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

To update you, the Nicholas F. Benton has now been proposed for deletion, which means that if no one removes the notice the article will be deleted automatically in a week. Will Beback talk 08:48, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]