User talk:Kittybug

Hey, this is Kelsey from your group, just wanted to leave you a message as per our assignment. Krhatley (talk) 20:10, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is Dan. I guess I didn't technically post on someone else's page yet, so...hi. Smythadon (talk) 05:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello Kittybug and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. We encourage you to read our instructions for students. Your instructor may wish to add your class to our list of school and university projects and he/she may want to read these instructions for teachers. For more help about educational projects using Wikipedia, see our classroom coordination project.

Here are some other pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Helpme}} before the question.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the discussion page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and should be treated accordingly.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Valfontis (talk) 17:57, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm just linking you to my page: User talk:Krhatley so you can see the articles I found and thought were interesting. Thanks! Krhatley (talk) 22:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC) Hey McKenna! Check out my talk page for some focuses for our project that I thought looked really interesting! Kmfrance (talk) 18:59, 21 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatompki (talk • contribs) [reply]

Feedback on Week 4 Assignments

I see that you caught yourself making at edit to the First Impressions before logging in and then logging in to provide the edit summary... nice catch! In general, when you are making changes it can be helpful to cite evidence rather than just making a statement. I also noted that you only linked to Kelsey's talk page with your list (and not your other group members) - you will want to make sure they are aware of what you are considering at this point. Your list should also go on your user page (not here on your talk page) as this is where you will be documenting your work. I'm not making the move for you as I believe that you linked here for Kelsey and I want others in your group to be able to easily see what you found. That being said, sometime soon you'll want to move that over to your user page. In terms of possible topics... all three topics are fairly well-developed articles at this point (Autism Treatments less so, perhaps, than the others). In general, it will be easier for you to focus on a topic that is stub-quality or weakly developed (or perhaps hasn't even been written about at all). From the handout in this week's recommended readings on choosing an article:

Advice for choosing articles to work on

Choose a term that is well established in the discipline, but only weakly represented on Wikipedia. The best choice is a topic where a lot of literature is available, but isn't covered extensively on Wikipedia.
Scope: Look for topics that are specific and narrow enough to be manageable, but broad enough that sufficient sources exist to write a solid, sizable article.
Gravitate toward "stub" and "start" class articles. These articles have only 1-2 paragraphs of information and are in need of expansion.
Before creating a new article, spend 15-20 minutes searching related topics on Wikipedia to make sure your topic isn't already covered. Often, an article may already exist under another name or be a subsection of a broader article.

What to avoid for student projects

Trying to improve articles on very broad topics (e.g. Law) or articles that are already of high quality on Wikipedia
Trying to improve articles on topics that are highly controversial, e.g. Global Warming, Abortion, Scientology, etc. (Start a sub-article instead.)
Working on something only sparsely covered by literature
Starting articles with titles that imply an essay-like approach, e.g. “The Effects That The Recent Sub-Prime Mortgage Crisis has had on the US and Global Economics” instead of “Subprime mortgage crisis” — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatompki (talk • contribs) 20:05, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback on Week 5 Assignments

Excellent work. I did notice that you had a small error on your closing reference tag - it should be </ref> so you'll want to make that edit. Additionally, you will want to make sure that your citations are in APA style. If you haven't yet been using your sandbox to make edits before moving them over to an article I would highly recommend this strategy as it is much cleaner but also includes a "cite" tool in your toolbar and which allows you to then choose from template, either a website, book, newspaper or journal and by plugging in the information it will cite it cleanly for you. Hope your group is moving closer to narrowing down a copy? Let me know if I can help! Tatompki (talk) 17:46, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Hey! Just wanted to let you know I did some editing on our page, I left a note on the talk page. Thanks, Krhatley (talk) 00:15, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]