Hallo Kitty and Welcome,

Sure, what would you like to know? Str1977 ^{(smile back)} 21:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you like what I did to your user page :)

The Septuagint is a great and foundational version and I think, when Greek is the language, it is already the version used.

As for the communion, the two did not communicate when attending the other's liturgy, as this would symbolize full communion which is, alas, not yet attained.

God bless. Str1977 ^{(smile back)} 22:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Wikipedia

Here are some links I thought useful:

Str1977 ^{(smile back)} 22:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sorry

It would be more comparable to having Khomeini having satanic horns or something - Jesus and the pope are not comparable. So much for your comparisons. But otherways, i don't defend it, it was childish and immature... sorry. --Striver 04:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was stupid of me. And yes, i had dubel standards at the time i did that. I hope that would not occur if i was the head of a newspaper, rather then having to fun on wikipedia and making a edit that i speedy reverted and deleted... man, i should have logged out first... anyhow, sorry, i meant no offence... Just on the side... was it really so bad? It was not even a little amusing? I promise i will never ever do that again, sorry sorry * 100. --Striver 05:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, it was 4:08 am at that time... if it counts for anything... --Striver 05:27, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I guess it was a little funny. But I have great admiration and affection for the Pope, and respect him a lot. I fully accept your apology though! KittyHawker 05:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, i appreciate it :) --Striver 05:34, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask what image Striver uploaded? Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 11:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE STOP

Please don't remove huge chunks of the text. Work based on consensus please.--Aminz 22:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have the right to remove huge sections without consensus since you don't own the article. --Aminz 22:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your email. Arrow740 23:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Opps sorry. I reverted it by mistake [1]. I thought you are adding quotes but you had removed them. Thanks --- ALM 20:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Islam and slavery

Good edits there. I'm going to restore most of it. Arrow740 02:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC) [2] an AfD that might interest you. Arrow740 03:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response

No, neither. There are certain ideas developed by Sufis that are attractive to me but that’s my only relationship with Sufism. As I said on my userpage, Sikhism seems to share those ideas and I’m not Sikh either, though Sikhism has much less baggage in my mind. Arrow740 23:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have examined Christianity carefully and have specific reasons why I did not adopt it. However, that’s all I have to say about it. By the way, a co-religionist of yours is being attacked. See Robert Spencer. Arrow740 23:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While I have supported the majority of your edits, it is better if you engage in discussion on the talk pages if you are going to make such major changes. It is good to be bold, but such major edits usually require lots of involvement on the talk page. Aminz has complained about you to this admin. There's nothing to worry about now, though. Arrow740 10:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of the Quran

If you have any time, could you look in over there? Arrow740 09:07, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Islam and slavery revised lead proposal

Dear Kittyhawker, as an interested editor would you please offer your opinion at article 62 on the talk page re this proposal. DavidYork71 08:56, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Differences between the Bible and the Qur'an

Your recent edit to Differences between the Bible and the Qur'an (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 20:24, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]