User talk:KittenLynch

August 2016

Hello, KittenLynch. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Abhishek Pictures, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. RunnyAmiga (talk) 19:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs as references

Hi there, re: this, we do not use blogs as references, because anybody with an internet connection can start a blog and call himself an expert in any subject. We only care what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say.

As a side note, "recently" is ephemeral, and nobody reading that will know if it was written five years ago or today. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:09, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Barney83Stinson (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:08, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]