User talk:Kisselbacher

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Kisselbacher. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Becky Sayles (talk) 20:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Dr. Isselbacher, I saw your question at the Teahouse, and took a look at an earlier version of the article. I see what you mean. There was a lot of content about your work that is missing from the current version. It seems like it should be in the article. Did one of the reviewers say anything specific about copyright concerns? If not, then I think we could put that content back in, just as it was. There would be couple of ways to cite it: 1) Use the Wikipedia footnote system, like the two footnotes that exist now, or 2) Use author-date style citations. I think the latter might be more appropriate, given the way your publications are laid out now. If you like, I would happy discuss the details of how that might be done. If you leave a reply here I will see it. Thanks. – Margin1522 (talk) 23:05, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]