User talk:Kissedsmiley

todo

081002 Dividends []fix-inaccurate and misleading charn of dividends as not double tax ; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dividend_tax#History []add history section per Saez , aka Piketty 2007, who thinks top1% is wrong, pg84 shows dividends were 12% for the 'poor' and 60% for tip-top thru 1970. Then 1983 to 1987 another big drop and after 1991 everyone made less than 10% which is likely interest not div; 1999 2% and 6% 1984 6% 17% 1982 7% 30% 1974 7% 40% http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/piketty-saezOUP04US.pdf

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Kissedsmiley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  –Sommers ^(Talk) 17:31, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Jello salad

Hi. I wanted to thank you for the improvements you made to the Jello salad page, and to tell you that I agree that the article is now encyclopedic enough not to be deleted. Good work. If there's anything I can tell you or help you with, please let me know on my user talk page. Happy editing! –Sommers ^(Talk) 17:31, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

080909 fix- add-cite re islamic slavery

//not sure if this cite had been lost due to vandalism or neglect. I could only find it on the very first revision 2007: cite#1 as edited by Elijahmeeks (Talk | contribs) at 02:05, 28 June 2007.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_modern_Africa#cite_note-11 Imam El Hassan Ould Benyamin of Tayarat in 1997 expressed his views about earlier proclamations ending slavery in his country as follows: "[it] is contrary to the teachings of the fundamental text of Islamic law, the Quran ... [and] amounts to the expropriation from muslims of their goods; goods that were acquired legally. The state, if it is Islamic, does not have the right to seize my house, my wife or my slave."[12]

12 Segal, p.206, in "Islam's Black Slaves: The Other Black Diaspora," quoted by Suzy Hansen of Salon.com on 5 April 2001 - http://archive.salon.com/books/int/2001/04/05/segal/index.html . The book cite is Ronald Segal (2002) http://www.amazon.com/Islams-Black-Slaves-Other-Diaspora/dp/0374527970/

080921 add-cite to YB []howto cite formatting

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Reinvestment_Act#Criticism

Economist Yaron Brook concluded succinctly, "The Government Did It:" through the stick of the CRA [and] the carrot of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the fed created the mortgage market debacle.

081114 chg-weasle word re Hitler's legacy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler#Legacy now; properly regarded as immoral was whitewash word; 'typically' instead of 'properly'

Note that the quote re Hitler is abysmal, portraying him as having colossal strengths: "who has performed these superb toils." Particularly in that context I think the phrase "typically regarded as immoral" serves to belittle his evil.

I came across this problem in checking via http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest

the assertion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tendentious_editing our article on Adolf Hitler does not portray him as a sensitive and misunderstood individual who was kind to his mother

I think that starting out with the 'typically' idea is a whitewash. Also, I think the length of the article detracts from the main point, such as the Holocaust, which was given about 5% of the total article. I disagree that Wikipedia needs to have an exhaustive study of Hitler's battle plans on its main page... perhaps there should be a family of war history pages.

081219 add- c# needs no line continuation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming_languages_(syntax) - Line_continuation

FIXED: License tagging for Steve Charnovitz.jpg

//This was 3rd of 3 posts they sent me; fix was I had asked Steve to explicitly give his approval, since it did not work for me to submit directly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Charnovitz https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Charnovitz_in_2009.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Charnovitz.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.56.113 (talk) 03:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)