User talk:Kisanrout3

June 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tiger Shroff has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tiger Shroff was changed by Kisanrout3 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899152 on 2015-06-05T09:47:45+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:47, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kisanrout3, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kisanrout3! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Worm That Turned (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] (talk) 00:18, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 05:30, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Edit summaries

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Bajrangi Bhaijaan does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 05:35, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding incorrect information

Hello, I'm 220 of Borg. Your edit to the page Jurassic World at 07:12, on 16 June 2015 appears to have added incorrect information, but another editor reverted it. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
• You changed the gross from $524.1 to 775.1 million, without saying why, and contrary to the source. The specific edit is here. Your edit was quickly reverted by another editor. 220 of ^Borg 05:45, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jurassic World

I did that right after 5 days the films gross was reached near 700 million dollars and if you think that I made wrong edit. Then I am sorry. I'll be careful in future. Thanks for noticing.Kisanrout3 (talk) 06:07, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Above reply copied from my talk page. 220 of ^Borg 11:49, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. I am not trying to be mean to you, just help you to follow normal Wikipedia(WP) procedures. like WP:VERIFY. If you had a reliable source, that said the gross had increased greatly, edited the figure, added the new source and left an edit summary, i.e. "updating gross per latest source" then you would be 'right'.

But:

you changed the figure, adding about 44% ($231 million to it)
you did not change the source for a new one, or indicate that the source had changed ie. a new access date,
no edit summary (or talk-page comment) to explain.

Unfortunately there is quite a lot of WP:Vandalism on WP and changing figures like that, without sourcing, are a classic form of vandalism. Another is saying a person has died, when they have not, like here. Rather embarrassing if a major public figures is involved, as has happened. That is why we question them when figures are changed without verifiability. This would be more so with a newish editor like yourself. Editors are expected to assume good faith (WP:AGF), on your part, but still query your edit.

PS: You could have answered my comment on your talk-page, (rather than mine) and placed a {{reply|220 of Borg}} template at the start, which would have notified me of your reply. It helps to keep the discussion in one place. I think most editors do that.

• Sorry for taking so long to answer, I started almost immediately you posted, but got 'distracted' by several other issues. 220 of ^Borg 11:49, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Other edits

That said, I have to also query your next two edits (after your reply to me) seen here, adding a budget of 150 Crore to Prem Ratan Dhan Payo, and here adding information about 2 movie projects to . Both seemed to be un-sourced. Remember, even if you are certain the information is true and correct, you need to be able to back them up with a reliable source. However, after a quick look around, I have fixed the movie link/s you added that were not working on Shroff's page. Even so, a source should still be provided as another WP page is not considered a reliable source. The movie page budget figure also needs a source. 220 of ^Borg 11:49, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger Shroff & Prem Ratan Dhan Payo etc: Thank you sir for re editing the tiger shroff page. I'm really thankful to you. And a source told me that the budget of prem ratan dhan pao is 150 crore. That's why i edited that. Btw thanks again sir and keep an eye on me sir if i do any mistake immediately report me sorry I'll make it correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kisanrout3 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 26 July 2015
Above reply copied from my talk page, & sub heading addded. 220 of ^Borg 07:24, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, it is easier if you reply on this page, not my talk-page, to keep the discussion in one place.

If you are discussing particular page/s you should link to the page/s, just in general, I knew which page were under discussion, but other editors might reply on my behalf, and not be aware.
Note that you have misspelled the movie's page as "prem ratan dhan pao", not "Prem Ratan Dhan Pa[y]o" [error bracketed]
Also note that, especially if linking, the page needs to be spelled correctly, including capitalisation Prem Ratan Dhan Payo works not Prem Ratan Dhan Pao, which is 'Red linked', unless there is a redirect of that exact name.

• I fixed your link to Flying jat (2016), which is incorrect, simply Flying Jat (no date) is correct, see here.

You said "... a source told me that the budget ... is 150 crore." But you didn't add the source to the page, which you need to do in future at the time of the edit. If you know what it is, please add it to the page.

At the very least, right after the gross figure insert:

150 crore<ref>Insert internet address here</ref>

as an absolute minimum reference, known as a 'bare URL'. Also adding the title, name of source, ie XYZ Newspaper, author, date of publication, and date of access are strongly recommended, See also Citation tools.

• I'll keep an eye on your edits, if I can, real life calls me away and I should be doing other 'real' things right now! If you go slowly, look at what other experienced editors do normally, and read the WP guidelines and help pages when needed, you should be OK, That is how I learned, plus a lot of experience, and some common sense!

• No need to call me "Sir". '220' or even 'Borg' is fine. ('Sir' makes me feel old(er) too!) Regards, 220 of ^Borg 07:24, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to User talk:220 of Borg, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history.
This will tell you if you have a link spelled or otherwise incorrect, as it will be red. It can also mean there is no page to be linked to. 220 of ^Borg 07:28, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]