User talk:KiruthikaRithesh

KiruthikaRithesh (talk)This is my talk pageKiruthikaRithesh (talk)

May 2024

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Online presence management. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 17:52, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury Thank you for your message. I apologize if my edits seemed inappropriate. I'm new to Wikipedia and still learning about its guidelines. I didn't mean to add links that violate Wikipedia's rules.

I'll make sure to review the external links guideline and spam guideline more thoroughly. In the future, I'll refrain from adding any links that could be considered promotional or inappropriate. If I believe a link should be included, I'll discuss it first on the article's talk page.

Thanks for bringing this to my attention, and I appreciate your patience. KiruthikaRithesh (talk) 02:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gudsho request

Hello KiruthikaRithesh. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:KiruthikaRithesh. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=KiruthikaRithesh|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Belbury (talk) 18:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Belbury,

Thank you for reaching out and bringing this to my attention. I understand your concerns regarding the nature of my edits. I want to assure you that I have no undisclosed financial stake in promoting any topic on Wikipedia.

I apologize if my editing practices have given the impression of paid advocacy. I am a passionate Wikipedia contributor who is committed to upholding the principles of neutrality and transparency.

I confirm that I am not receiving any form of compensation for my edits, either directly or indirectly. I will ensure to abide by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including disclosing any conflicts of interest in the future.

Thank you for your guidance on the appropriate procedures for disclosure. I will take your advice into consideration and act accordingly. KiruthikaRithesh (talk) 02:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You said on a talk page Hello, can you please add Gudsho to the list of Online Video Platforms? We also has a video platform for creators. Can you please add us to that list?

If you represent or have any connection to Gudsho (even if you don't regard them as paying you for these edits), you must follow the guidelines at WP:COI. Belbury (talk) 08:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury

Thank you for bringing up the concern regarding conflict of interest guidelines. I understand the importance of maintaining neutrality and integrity in Wikipedia articles, particularly when there's a connection to the subject matter. I'll ensure to adhere to the COI guidelines, disclose any affiliations appropriately, and edit articles with impartiality and reliance on reliable sources. KiruthikaRithesh (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]