User talk:Kirkman

Source on Unreleased Songs

Hey, Josh. Hope you're doing fine. If you can post a source for the info you added about the "unreleased songs" of Petra, you can post it. I've been working on the article for a while now, so any help with it is more than welcome. Thief12 22:18, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I'll check those sources and post the appropriate links. Perhaps tomorrow. BTW, since I assume you have way more knowledge of Petra than I do, feel free to check any stuff that might be written in the article that could be incorrect. One of the parts I'd like to work with more is the Members list. I'm sure there are some missing, and some that might be cut from the list (for example, someone added Greg Ruup and he was just a touring musician, stuff like that) so if you have any info about Mike Brandenstein, the blond drummer that played during the first J&H shows (Johnson? or something), Steve McElyea, or any other obscure band member... from the late 70s, early 80s, please share. Thanks. Thief12 04:35, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Christian music

Hi Josh. I thought Thief was you, seeing that he started the Petra article, however, he kindly pointed out that you exist here. :) Anyways, I've just started the Christian music portal and was wondering two things:

Firstly, if you could upload some good-quality photos of Petra onto Wikipedia. We require completely-free images to be shown for the Selected Picture section of the portal. I'm quite unable to find completely-free images and your name popped into my head. :)
Second, since you've a vast knowledge of Christian music (Petra included), was wondering whether you could help us out with the portal. Any ideas/suggestions/comments/expansion of articles within the portal's scope and reach would be much appreciated, believe me.

That'll be all for now, I guess. Do reply when you have the time. Thanks and happy Wiki-ing!!! aJCfreak yAk 11:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Petra picture

Hey, Josh. Hope all is well with you. Just wondering if you could work out the uploading of any pic you have of Petra for the article. We're looking forward to getting the article to GA status, and possibly FA, but with a copyrighted pic in the infobox, that won't be able. If you have any pic of yours you'd like to contribute, feel free to upload it. Thanks. Thief12 02:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same request as above... was beaten to it. :) aJCfreak yAk 17:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject St. Louis

Hello, I noticed you've made edits to St. Louis articles or that you are in some way connected to metropolitan area. I thought you might want to become a member of the St. Louis WikiProject. We've recently built the project page and started a drive to improve St. Louis related articles. Please take a look to edit an article or add one of your own. Once an article's status has been agreed upon, feel free to stop by and lend a hand in getting it to featured article status. Hope you can participate!

Grey Wanderer | Talk 01:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Petra (band)

Hello again, Josh. I've started a discussion at Talk:Petra (band)#The band - it or they ? to gain consensus on whether the band should be referred to as it or they. I know that you previously voted for the band to be called it with the plural form being used to refer to the band members. I felt that there could be a lot of trouble and confusion (as the article itself is contradictory) and hence, restarted the discussion looking for consensus. Please do join in, if you have the time. aJCfreak yAk 22:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Falcons eye.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Falcons eye.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:26, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ferguson Public Library

Hey Josh, This is Ben Swofford I used to work with Yoli at the library, and at the UM-St. Louis newspaper. When I notice it was you that made some edits to the Ferguson library page that I created (I am Brps311) I had to stop by and say HI. Great catch on inserting "Municipal" do not know how I missed that. Since you probably know this stuff better than I do, is there some way to change the page name once created, it still comes up without the Municipal, even though you made that edit. (Change got made, thanks!) I had to create that page for a Masters in Library Science class I am taking on Internet Research. Part of the Wikipedia week assignment. Gotta say it is kinda addicting once you start realizing the power you have to create the truth. Hope you and the family are great, see you on Facebook! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.158.60.205 (talk) 22:22, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ben, good to hear from you. Someone else has fixed the problem of the page title, so no worries there.

Wikipedia is pretty cool overall, but the politics of it bothers me sometimes. The notion that people and things must be "notable" in order to be included in the self-purported "sum of all human knowledge" really, really bugs me.

Kirkman (talk) 04:28, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Kirkman. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! -- Trevj (talk) 06:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Sre.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sre.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:07, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this is all pretty stupid. I already had some of that information on the image. However, to appease the ridiculous Wikipedia bureaucracy, I have added the boilerplate rationale. Kirkman (talk) 00:08, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to Wikipedia Takes St. Louis!

Dust off your Polaroid camera and pack your best lenses. The first-ever Wikipedia Takes St. Louis photo hunt kicks off Sat, Sept. 15, at 12:30pm in downtown St. Louis. Tour the streets of the Rome of the West with other Wikipedians and even learn a little St. Louis history. This event is a fun and collaborative way to enhance St. Louis articles with visual content. Novice photographers welcome! Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 01:48, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Space Empire Elite

The article Space Empire Elite has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I love BBS history, but this game game does not meet WP:N criteria. It doesn't have significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar · · 06:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Space Dynasty

The article Space Dynasty has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I love BBS history, but this game game does not meet WP:N criteria. It doesn't have significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar · · 06:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Solar Realms Elite

The article Solar Realms Elite has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I love BBS history, but this game game does not meet WP:N criteria. It doesn't have significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar · · 06:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BBS door games

Since BBS door games as a topic is notable, though the games individually lack notability, do you think it would make sense to move the popular BBS door games into a section within BBS door? czar · · 06:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I couldn't disagree more. They are an important part of technology history, involving some significant figures like Jon Radoff. I'd like to improve the articles but have been pressed for time recently. What I can say is that this field is under-researched right now. When you see all the research coming out now about the history of video games ("Racing the Beam," etc), it is only a matter of a time before similar articles and books will be available on door games. Deleting these articles would be premature and wrong. Kirkman (talk) 05:15, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have a personal interest in retrogaming, and I understand your POV, but I approached you about your view on combining these articles into a single door games article (notable as a group/genre/era) because otherwise they will eventually be lost for their individual non-notability. Do you have any thoughts on that? czar · · 06:11, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I fundamentally disagree with your premise. Games like Space Empire Elite, SRE, and BRE pioneered strategy games concepts and were precursors to MMOGs. They deserve their own articles and are notable. Kirkman (talk) 18:20, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If they are notable, can you produce non-self-published (independent) sources? Your book reference on SRE looks like the right direction, but almost all of the other references come from self-published sources (not credible for Wikipedia's purposes). czar · · 18:32, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Space Empire Elite for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Space Empire Elite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Empire Elite until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cnilep (talk) 02:04, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kirkman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]