User talk:Kirkburn

Impersonation enquiry

Nope; not me. Someone's an imposter or it's a helluva coincidence. I know zilch about WoW. - Lucky 6.9 01:25, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to be of service. Believe me, you're dealing with an imposter. About all I can tell you about WoW is what it is. Details? Not a clue. :)) I'd appreciate it if you'd block that account since it might be someone who I blocked and is impersonating me in hopes of smearing my name. Merry Christmas. The original and still the best Lucky 6.9 01:35, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WoWWiki_Main_Page.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:WoWWiki_Main_Page.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 04:20, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WoW Wiki

Hmm, what a odd situation. I do not have a registered account on WoW Wiki and Invision is definitely not an account belonging to me. I was not able to find a link to my userpage though. Are you sure he linked to my Wikipedia Userpage? Mkdw ^talk 02:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WoWWiki elinks

Since most Warcraft stuff was moved off Wikipedia with the excuse "WoWWiki has it", I'm adding the previously templated link to WoWWiki on related articles. Kirkburn 20:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The biographies of living persons policy and the undue weight policy

Please review the above core content policies, which clearly spell out why I have undertaken the actions I have. Please do not blindly revert; rather, discuss on the article talk pages. Wikipedia is not a tabloid or a scandal sheet; it is not the role of an encyclopedia to create a hyper-detailed compendium of every single time this person was ever in the tabloids for one reason or another. By going into excruciating detail on this matter, we violate the neutral point of view policy by placing extreme and unwarranted emphasis on this part of his life, distorting the true picture. We need to encyclopedically discuss his repeated run-ins with the law and drug abuse. This, however, does not mean creating a day-by-day, blow-by-blow account. Summarize the issue. Let's work together. FCYTravis (talk) 17:30, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking the article is also surely not what you do. I restored the page to it's non-blanked state and made no comment on whether it was good or bad content. Kirkburn 17:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I blanked it as preferential to deletion - it's now been simply redirected, which works for me as well. FCYTravis (talk) 17:54, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why should it have been deleted? it was cited, and factual ... surely merge would have been more appropriate. Kirkburn 17:58, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Internet Explorer 6.png

[[:Image:Internet Explorer 6.png|thumb|Section of talk is about this image of Internet Explorer.]] Can you possible tell me what version of Windows (or other OS) your are running for the Image:Internet Explorer 6.png? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spitfire19 (talk • contribs) 18:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not, I didn't upload it ... I reverted it back from an old screenshot. Kirkburn (talk) 12:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]