User talk:KirinD

Welcome...

Hello, KirinD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Mike Cline (talk) 20:21, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

In addition, as a result of a recent ruling, all anonymous IP editors and accounts with less than 500 edits and 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. RolandR (talk) 21:06, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KirinD, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi KirinD! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 23:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm RolandR. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to George Galloway have been reverted or removed because they could be seen to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 18:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Omar Barghouti, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. 66.87.114.95 (talk) 15:01, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Omar Barghouti, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Omar Barghouti was changed by KirinD (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886465 on 2015-12-20T15:45:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:45, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot is reverting facts. What is this protect edits regarding terrorists?

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Elders (organization).
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: The Elders (organization) was changed by KirinD (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921454 on 2015-12-20T16:14:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeatedly pushing a political view on articles related to Israel/Palestine, even after having had a notice of discretionary sanctions posted on your user talk page. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:58, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Block logged at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Log of blocks and bans. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:02, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KirinD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I posted facts, that does not violate rules

Decline reason:

Have you actually read any of the warnings that were placed on this page prior to your being blocked? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've fixed the unblock template for you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:45, 20 December 2015 (UTC) I read them and disagree with the decision.KirinD (talk) 18:47, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions was changed by KirinD (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947057 on 2015-12-23T13:25:02+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You were told to stop your political agitation, but you did not stop, so you have been stopped. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:50, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocking me because you don't want an open dialougue to improve pages

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KirinD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocked for putting in new facts or removing POV

Decline reason:

The block is sound and clearly warranted to prevent further disruption. Further unblock requests that do not address your actions and their disruptive nature will likely be declined outright. You should likely read WP:GAB if you intend on appealing again. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:53, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The block was for political agitation: "The anti Israel lobby promotes the myth...", "The Palestinian National Authority makes the unsustaiated claim that...", etc. Some of the others were evidently so serious that they were rev'delled, to boot. Furthermore, the current sanctions in place forbid editors with less than 500 edits and 30 days' tenure from editing in this area. GAB^Hello! 15:59, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The rev-deleted edits were clear BLP violations - making unsourced accusations against living people. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am being blocked by racists admins