Jump to content

User talk:Kiraroshi1976/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10→Archive 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Thunder and Lightning (film)
added links pointing to Charles Napier, Richard Holden and Malcolm Jones
Dante Falconeri
added a link pointing to Ned Ashton
Lee Reherman
added a link pointing to David Mitchell

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

 Fixed March 22, 2016 - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 12:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Guns of the Magnificent Seven

Check it out, I just saw the film on TV and decided to spruce up the article. The film, nevertheless, is a "stinker". FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

@Bzuk:Thank you. The article looks much, much better. You did a great job! - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 20:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

A Real American Hero (film)
added links pointing to Ann Street, George Boyd and W.O. Smith
Future Zone
added links pointing to Don Stewart, Ted Prior and Dave Scott
Ken Howard
added links pointing to Shubert Theatre and Majestic Theatre
Sean Blakemore
added links pointing to James Seale and Brian Cox
Blackout (2007 film)
added a link pointing to Jeffrey Wright
China Lake (film)
added a link pointing to Beth Tate
Instant Justice
added a link pointing to Scott Miller
Mastergate
added a link pointing to Henry Jones
Return to Frogtown
added a link pointing to Kelsey
Tactical Assault
added a link pointing to Bruce Anderson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:48, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

 Fixed March 31, 2016 - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 02:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

WWE Women's Championship

I believe that there should be a completely separate page for the new title. WWE.com has the original title and the new one with completely separate lineages. Whereas the original is still listed as retired, and under the name "Women's Championship", the current title has only one title holder listed under the name "WWE Women's Championship." Plus, the website is saying that Charlotte is the first to hold the title. They're not one and the same, they're completely separate entities.Dohvahkiin (talk) 04:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

@Dohvahkiin: I think there should have been more time to discuss the issue before the moving and separate pages. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 04:58, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
@Dohvahkiin:I think this might help: [1] - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 04:59, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
That links only to the new title. The older one is still listed as retired. [2]Dohvahkiin (talk) 12:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
@Dohvahkiin:The only reason I proposed the merger is because of the debacle with the WWE Heavy Weight Championship belt. I just think it would be best to wait until there is clear clarification. Why have to delete pages and move pages until the clarification? I guess i was trying to not have all these moves and deleted pages. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 22:24, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Young Marrieds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Hogan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

 Fixed - April 9, 2016 - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 10:12, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Template:Refimprove

Please read Template:Refimprove: This template indicates that the article needs additional inline citations. This template should be used only for articles where there are some, but insufficient, inline citations to support the material currently in the article. Don't use this tag for articles that contain no unreferenced material, even if all the material is supported by a single citation. --Cavarrone 20:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

@Cavarrone:Articles should have enough refs so that it is not a stub. Wikipedia:Stub. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 20:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
For stub-level articles we have appropriate stub templates, the refimprove template serves other purposes (articles which contains multiple unsourced and contentious claims which require an inline reference to be verified). Also, an article is a stub based on its length, not on its number of refs. The articles you added the tags would remain stubs even with 20 refs as long as they are so short. My best, Cavarrone 20:31, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gareth Thomas (actor)
added a link pointing to Rugby
Norma Connolly
added a link pointing to Doubleday
The Big Tease
added a link pointing to Kevin Allen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

 Fixed - April 16, 2016 - 10:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Total Divas

Hey! How are you? Haven't seen you around the Total Divas page in a while! Haha MSMRHurricane (talk) 00:28, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Hey! I've been very busy in real life. How is the page going? I know the season ended. Once I know when the new season will begin, I'll help out and create the new season page. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 00:31, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Sorry! I forgot to check this page, I always assume I'd get a notification when you reply! The page is managing, I'm just leaving the rating part to you! Seeing as I'm not sure how to do the middle column... I attempted the latest episode but am not sure if it's correct! Haha. And please tell me you agree with me about updating the cast tables and lists after tomorrow night when the season finale airs? I just find it logical to do it in that order, even though we have proof! MSMRHurricane (talk) 06:05, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Normally you would get reply. Sometimes, I don't get replies about pages I have not been to in a while. Yes, it should wait maybe even until the page is created for the 6th season. That should be done when you know an exact date for the season premiere. What you have done with the pages is great. I just made minor improvements and added info. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 06:15, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! Team work! I'll leave the creation of the season 6 page to you, I might mess it up! And I might update the table after the season 5 finale seeing as we already know who is going to be series regulars for next season. :) MSMRHurricane (talk) 06:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
I'll do it by the end of the week if you are going to update the cast on the main page. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 11:30, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Houdini and Doyle

By your logic, none of the programs only available through Netflix or Amazon Prime have aired yet, despite them being available to watch by millions of people worldwide, and being able to be watched on TV. There are an increasing number of shows getting aired via online platforms - insisting it only counts if it has aired on a terrestrial platform is spurious logic. And even if it held water, there is no good reason to delete the name of episode nine, which has been given by a reliable source. 86.160.202.114 (talk) 02:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC) Adding - and clearly other Wikipedians disagree with you regarding online airing. cf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Night_of_the_Doctor which states the episode first aired on 14th November 2013, which was when it was released online. It has never had a terrestrial airing. 86.160.202.114 (talk) 02:29, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

The article does not state it is being aired online. It only states a terrestrial platform. With that in mind, it has to air on a terrestrial platform to be included. That is a Doctor Who episode, not a Houdini and Doyle episode. That article also gives citations as to why it aired online. You did not provide that. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 02:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Whether the article lists it being aired online or not is irrelevent - it is available online. http://watch.nowtv.com/watch-entertainment/houdini-doyle/2c57b5b9a9f53510VgnVCM1000000b43150a____/seasons/undefined You can not only see that it is available, but also that episode 8 is available for viewing. And I did provide a citation for the name of episode nine, you just didn't bother to read the citation. Try this one http://www.itv.com/presscentre/ep9week18/houdini-doyle And before you say "is it a reliable source", the link is to the website of the UK TV site that co-produces the show. 86.160.202.114 (talk) 02:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
That is relevant. And it would be put in the Broadcast section with the citation after it has aired on a terrestrial platform. I did, however, add the episode names for 8 & 9 with the ref you provided. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 03:29, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
So, despite it clearly having aired online, and despite other shows which air online first (or exclusively) having their information listed, you don't wish to accept the information for this particular entry unless it has aired in the format you want. Care to explain why this show has to air on terrestrial television before information can be posted, yet shows like Daredevil, Jessica Jones, Bosch, Man in the High Castle, etc. do not? 86.160.202.114 (talk) 03:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Clearly the show was developed for TV, not online. Clearly Daredevil Marvel's Daredevil, or simply Daredevil, is an American web television series. Also the others you mention clearly state they are web series. Bosch is aired on Amazon Prime, and web service. The Man in the High Castle is on Amazon Video which means it is not aired on TV. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 04:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
I'd say it is developed both for online and TV, as with most shows these days. Regardless of that, no matter what format you feel it might have been developed for, it has aired first online - that is an irrefutable fact. But apparently you don't want to deal in facts, or have Wikipedia reflect same. I'm going to copy and paste this to the Houdini and Doyle page, so others can join this debate. 86.160.202.23 (talk) 11:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Go ahead and put it on the talk page. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 11:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Time to Heal (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarah Freeman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

 Fixed - April 24, 2016 - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 00:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Houdini and Doyle. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan (TALK) 04:38, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

@TransporterMan: I have replied there. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 04:49, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kiraroshi1976/Archive_8&oldid=1084049214"