User talk:Kinsher

Ron Gallemore

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ron Gallemore, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ronpgallemore.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ron Gallemore

A tag has been placed on Ron Gallemore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:08, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Ron Gallemore. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Although the article has been changed, the reformulation is not enough to remove the copyright violation. ttonyb1 (talk) 05:10, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ron_Gallemore.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Ron_Gallemore.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 14:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

advice

As reviewing admin, I think it's not clear copyvio--but the first paragraph needs to be further rewritten--it's still too close, and should be re-done from scratch.

As for the CV, we normally do not include abstracts . Please see the requirements of WP:PROF, which normally in practice requires substantial publications and citations to show recognition by the profession, or major awards--do not list minor onw, or ones confined to a single university. Now, I see from Web of Science there are 60 published papers, so I added the full references and citation counts for the 7 highest, which is enough. It may or may not hold up at WP:AFD--there are many articles, but none are really heavily cited for the medical sciences. I don;t decide--we go by community opinionDGG (talk) 21:31, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for you addition and comments. I will rewrite the career bio.Kinsher (talk) 22:19, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ron Gallemore.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ron Gallemore.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.retinamaculainstitute.com/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:40, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]