User talk:Kinh Duong Vuong

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kinh Duong Vuong (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just logged in. I don't know User:JacquesNguyen. I don't have any other account. What do I do that related to this user?

Decline reason:

Per discussion below, and your self-incriminating comments. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You edited from the same IP address, and made edits such as

[1] and [2]. Is it just a coincidence? Badagnani (talk) 06:23, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, User:Mamenchisaurus, blocked in April 2008 as a sockpuppet of User:JacquesNguyen, stated:

“

I'm not a shockpuppet of JacquesNguyen. This's the only account I have. If you said my edits look like someone, then it's just ciincidence. There are many different users edits the same things. Check at my edit history, is there something look like that of JacquesNguyen. I'm a victim just like User:Doremon360.

”

However, this user gave himself away by spelling "sockpuppet" as "shockpuppet," a very unusual misspelling that JacquesNguyen also used consistently. Badagnani (talk) 06:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]