User talk:Kingvigor

Christina DeRosa

Please don't add unsourced information to Wikipedia like you did in the Christina DeRosa article. The information in the article was unsourced and was simply a copy-paste action. If you choose to re-add the information please properly cite the contributing source(s). Also, the external links were excessively long, my reason for leaving just her myspace and offical website up. Thank You.--_ BaRiMzI _ 01:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to add the unsourced information to the article. If you continue than please properly cite your sources. You cannot simply copy and past information into Wikipedia. It works to belittle the quality of the encyclopedia.--_ BaRiMzI _ 17:21, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Please consider carefully the requests above about sourcing. This is your final warning - if you continue to add unsourced information to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If you have questions about sourcing or anything else, please feel free to contact me. - Philippe | Talk 17:28, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citing sources

This article should help you with citing sources in an article, Wikipedia:Citing sources. Also, you don't need to sign what you contributed in an article.--_ BaRiMzI _ 19:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christina DeRosa

Just wanted to let you know that you don't need to sign yours edits on the article page. Records of user edits are kept in the articles history.--_ BaRiMzI _ 00:26, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't remove the tags from the page. Those are there so other editors can better the page.--_ BaRiMzI _ 00:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please don't remove the tags from the article. This article had information simply copy and pasted from a website without citing a source. I've tried what I can to make the information different from the original as possible but it is still victim to a lack of sources. Also, it does indeed read like an advertisement. The information pasted into it was from a website meant to promote Chrisitina.--_ BaRiMzI _ 06:57, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And you need to identify the copyright holder on the image you uploaded again. If it's you, please add your name as the photographer. Dicklyon 19:51, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Clinton Wallace (Photo Journalist)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Clinton Wallace (Photo Journalist), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Clinton Wallace (Photo Journalist) is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Clinton Wallace (Photo Journalist), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo license

The trouble with your Christina DeRosa photo license is that you're not identifying who the photographer is that is giving the permission; if it's you, you need to identify yourself. You can't both be anonymous and granting rights to a photographer's photo. Dicklyon 22:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Invitation.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Invitation.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christina DeRosa

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Christina DeRosa, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Magioladitis (talk) 23:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Christina DeRosa.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Christina DeRosa.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:11, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christina DeRosa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christina DeRosa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina DeRosa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. v/r - T P 07:18, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]