User talk:Kingsgambit717

October 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Collegiate secret societies in North America, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Inserting names of chess players unconstructively in articles. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 20:00, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Stamma

Is it really is, and there is a source for it, then put it. Everything needs a source. I did not see a source. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 20:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Your recent editing history at Collegiate secret societies in North America shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ... discospinster _talk 20:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Kingsgambit717, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kingsgambit717! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 9 October 2020 (UTC)