User talk:Kingpinn2
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Kingpinn2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Lloyd Garmadon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tchaliburton (talk) 05:52, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
The article Lloyd Garmadon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- There's nothing here to suggest any notability whatsoever.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tchaliburton (talk) 05:52, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Skales (Ninjago)
[edit]Hello, Kingpinn2,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Skales (Ninjago) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skales (Ninjago) .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, 069952497a (U-T-C-E) 18:17, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Lloyd Garmadon
[edit]Hello, Kingpinn2,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Lloyd Garmadon should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd Garmadon .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, 069952497a (U-T-C-E) 18:21, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Kruncha and Nuckal
[edit]The article Kruncha and Nuckal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Page seems unlikely to comply with Wikipedia:Notability; all sources I can find are not independent of the subject (in this case, created by Lego).
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Noah Kastin (talk) 09:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)