User talk:Kingmoose8

Welcome!

Hello, Kingmoose8, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Sexey's School. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Rod ^talk 21:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Alcock on Sexey's School

I understand why you made your edit to Sexey's School. In my personal opinion footballers are less notable than academics etc, however others may find Craig Alcock more notable. As he is considered notable enough to have an article on wikipedia I have put him back into the list.— Rod ^talk 21:43, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to remove him from the list again I will not revert, but as I say different people have different ideas about what is notable.— Rod ^talk 07:34, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is a subjective concept and always influenced by the "recency effect" but in wp terms often relates to the avail;ability of a number of secondary sources. The order of the list is usually alphabetical rather than some perceived order of importance which may be difficult for a casual reader to make sense of. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists may also be of interest.— Rod ^talk 08:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grave and unsupported accusations

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Talk:School uniforms by country. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can discuss the ethical issues you believe are involved on the relevant talk pages 1) without bringing in irrelevancies such as UK or EU laws that you believe might be involved, since Wikipedia is not subject to those laws (see also WP:NLT) and such talk can create a chilling effect; and 2) without making slurs against the photographers involved. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:49, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]