User talk:Kingmeatballs

2020 artwork

Ozraptor

DYK for Australotitan

On 21 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Australotitan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Australotitan is the largest dinosaur discovered in Australia? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Australotitan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Australotitan), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ulughbegsaurus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Specie. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Daniel Ferguson—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:37, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below this notice. Materialscientist (talk) 10:37, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kingmeatballs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My sincerest apologies for my little brother's incredibly underwhelming behavior in regard to the article he vandalized (Daniel Ferguson). I assure you that I will continue to contribute to Wikipedia in a meaningful way, as I had been before the account was banned. Thank you. Kingmeatballs (talk) 10:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Thanks for letting us know you allowed your account to be compromised. This is the end of the line, no further unblock requests will be considered for this account as per WP:COMPROMISED. Yamla (talk) 10:27, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.