User talk:Kingarthurix

May 2023

Your recent editing history at Solomonic dynasty shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Same goes for Yekuno Amlak. Also, stop editing while logged out. DeCausa (talk) 08:23, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

who are you to tell me this when your edits are conflicting with efficiency and availability. Kingarthurix (talk) 12:07, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That makes no sense in English. What are you trying to say? Say it another way. DeCausa (talk) 16:00, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you are clearly reverting my edits for no reason as the one ive put up is a more clear and respectable version and your reversions really have no reason as it was both made at similar times i dont know wby you keep reverting it but stop acting like a child this is my countries history and it shouldnt be abused and disrespected and i also feel like you have used racism against me as english isnt my first language and i feel deeply offended, please act like an adult. Thank you Kingarthurix (talk) 19:56, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Historians say there is no credible evidence for the Solomonic dynasty descending from the House of David. For example, see this. The Kebra Nagast is merely a collection of 14th century myths created for political purposes. Stop trying to put that nonsense into the Solomonic dynasty article. DeCausa (talk) 21:37, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:BasedHistorian PHD per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BasedHistorian PHD. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

RoySmith (talk) 14:13, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]