Jump to content

User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2013/10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requesting help

[edit]

Hi,

Wish you seasons greeting.If you remember me I am a beurocrat from mr-wikipedia and previously we had a discussion on your talk page regarding edit filters.

At mr-wikipedia we do have problem of users not giving references enough number of times other reference related issues,and we do have few filters to deal with various related issues.

This should work:
King of 06:14, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Testing your suggested solution with actual filters. Thanks and its very nice of you.

Warm regards

Mahitgar (talk) 08:56, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia NYC Meetup! Saturday October 5

[edit]
Jefferson Market Public Library
Please join the Wikimedia NYC Meetup on October 5, 2013!
Everyone gather at Jefferson Market Library to further Wikipedia's local outreach
for education, museums, libraries and planning WikiConference USA.
--Pharos (talk) 22:05, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky Diaz and the Family Jam Band

[edit]

Hello!

It appears our page Lucky Diaz and the Family Jam Band has been deleted and cites your user as the cause. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucky_Diaz_and_the_Family_Jam_Band

We were just nominated for a Latin Grammy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_Grammy_Awards_of_2013 and are on several other sites via Wikipedia. The fact that our site can not be linked is very stressful and needs to be fixed.

If you can please fix this or tell us how to do so- we would appreciate it very much.

All the best, Alisha Gaddis Lucky Diaz and the Family Jam Band — Preceding unsigned comment added by AGaddis13 (talkcontribs) 22:41, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to file an appeal for its restoration at WP:DRV. -- King of 06:18, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

19:57, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 October 2013

[edit]

File:Azkals logo.JPG

[edit]

So what if I nominated it again? It's not disruptive especially since the reasoning is legit! It only seem disruptive because of multiple nominations. You can go back here, where User:B was first to mention (good on him) that it failed NFCC #8 (yes it was only there that this NFCC #8 argument was first brought up), yet it was "keep"? It should have been deleted then. You can even see for yourself that it really does not meet the criteria! Whether it be this particular one or any other fan made (yes, whether you like it or not and whether you think it's relevant or not, these are fan made), there is no point/use in having it in the Philippines national football team page! All these arguments by User:Howard the Duck that this logo is legit are barely anything, if anything at all. All this, "it's been adopted by....." stuff or in that same FFD in the link above, "In the Philippines, national teams are run as if they're club teams" or whatever other random argument he brings up. He makes it seem that what he's actually saying has weight or connection to make this logo relevant/legit when in fact it has barely anything to do with it, if anything at all. Again, there are a ton of these randomly made azkal logos and all have been adopted by many random people and sites. What makes this particular logo more relevant/legit than the others when it's all the same nonsense? Where's the sources for that? Simple.... NONE! Therefore it fails the criteria for keeping. Banana Fingers (talk) 00:36, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is disruptive precisely because of 1) the multiple nominations; 2) the fact that you have failed to bring any new arguments to any new nomination. -- King of 01:04, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 October 2013

[edit]

Hello

[edit]

I am looking for a very fair objective admin here. please contact me michawinti(at)gmail.com thank you 84.75.133.108 (talk) 19:57, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on which photo would be better for the Rebecca Housel Infobox in this discussion? If you are unable to, I understand; you don't have to reply to this message. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 03:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

[edit]

As you previously participated in related discussions you are invited to comment at the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC for AfC reviewer permission criteria. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:17, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 October 2013

[edit]

09:12, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

CurtMcArdle

[edit]

He figured out a way through the edit filter despite having been blocked beforehand. Except I don't know what filter was used to block him.—Ryulong (琉竜) 17:33, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

[edit]

09:42, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia NYC Meetup- "Greenwich Village In The 60s" Editathon! Saturday November 2

[edit]
Jefferson Market Public Library
Please join Wikipedia "Greenwich Village In The 60s" Editathon on November 2, 2013!
Everyone gather at Jefferson Market Library to further Wikipedia's local outreach
for Greenwich Village articles on the history and the community.
--Pharos (talk) 21:58, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]