User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2009/02

Sex Wars

Hi, it's Sarah, was idly googling sex wars and found your deleted wiki page. Curious who you are? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.79.239.108 (talk) 11:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

What page were you talking about? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Celebrity Skin - The Seminal Los Angeles Glam Band

Why was this page deleted? Celebrity Skin was an amazing band that affected the L.A. scene in a huge way. They deserve to be acknowledged. Why have they been deleted?

76.94.198.53 (talk) 19:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Skin Fan

I'm not sure what you mean. The page is still here: Celebrity Skin. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Celebrity Skin (The Band)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celebrity_Skin_(band) This page is not still there. According to the box on the page, it's been deleted by you. There's no other information other than that it's been deleted by you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.198.53 (talk) 16:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

It was deleted because it does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for bands. If you believe that the band is notable, then remember to assert notability by providing verifiable citations. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

two world records and a current event for grid shaping removed as trivia

Did you make this edit or did someone else gain access to your account? I have reverted. 69.228.209.174 (talk) 18:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

I did make that edit. Although world records are nice to know, they are not considered sufficiently encyclopedic for inclusion in this article. It is not enough that a fact be impressive; every sentence in an article should contribute to the overall understanding of the topic. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

I strongly disagree with your interpretation of the notability of these facts. Is your judgment that the largest and lightest batteries are not of primary interest in the field of electrochemistry rooted in personal opinion or evidence? Is there any source or anyone who agrees with your opinion on the notability of these records? Please reply here. 69.228.209.174 (talk) 08:21, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

KISS principle

I've removed the OR tag you placed on KISS principle. The docs for that tag state that it must be accompanied by an entry on the talk page stating what you think is wrong with the article. It is important to pay attention to this, because without such a comment no-one knows when to remove it, or more importantly what the perceived problem is. There are many articles that have tags like this on for years and no-one knows why they were put there in the first place. CrispMuncher (talk) 21:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free media (File:Memorex.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Memorex.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)