User talk:King Solomon's Ring

March 2015

I have reverted your edits because you were adding commentary which does not belong in a Wikipedia article. If you wish to comment on the article content, the place to do that is on the article's talk page, and you need to provide published reliable sources to support your views. --David Biddulph (talk) 18:24, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

I don't think, it's fair to have done that because I am mentioned in the article and treated unfairly by the author, Carol Cannon; does she have anything to prove that I had withheld the money; it's a lie and I have the right to defend myself. It's a pity and a lack of integrity that Wikipedia treats people carrying names like mine not in the same way it does with people carrying names like Carol Cannon; a complete lack of integrity

Wikipedia is supposed to be an information provider not a site where people insult and put blames and lies about other people. You had erased my response to Carol Cannon about what she wrote about me; false statements and lies; so either you let me in the same page respond to her statements about me and I can prove everything I had written or else you tell her to withdraw everything she wrote about me; that would be fair. If it's not done then I am going to have consult with a lawyer for having allowed her to display personal attacks against me that she cannot prove — Preceding unsigned comment added by King Solomon's Ring (talk • contribs) 21:06, 15 March 2015‎ (UTC)

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. - David Biddulph (talk) 21:28, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Mister and sorry for having infringed Wikipedia's policy; but please understand that I have been insulted and not treated the same manner than Carol Cannon was treated because she was not told to comment on personal matters especially when she cannot prove them and on top of it that they are false; anyway, I went ahead and erased the part about me that I thought was a lie by Ms. Cannon and I can prove it; if I have infringed the rules, please let me know again. Thank you again