User talk:KingShuffler

June 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Steel Vengeance. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 07:52, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dlohcierekim. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your changing of cited statistics appears to be deliberately disruptive. The first drop on Magnum XL-200 is well-know to be 194.7 ft and has been publicized in perhaps hundreds of journals. The statistic was provided by both Arrow Dynamics and Cedar Point. You changed that figure twice without providing any reason for the change or providing a valid source. You have continued to change statistics on multiple coasters at Cedar Point without explanation and without providing a valid source. All of these edits have been reverted, and then you reverted them back.—JlACEer (talk) 06:16, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly..—JlACEer (talk) 06:16, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]