User talk:KingOfAllThings/Archives/2021/April

Problem on Yamato people article

A new user includes large amounts of unrelated topics/content into the article Yamato people. Possibly motivated by Korean nationalism. Could you please take a look and take action. He now started to accuse me of being another user which he reverted as well. Thank you in advance and a nice day. 46.125.250.70 (talk) 06:31, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Excuse me, you are the one who has to hide because I revealed your sock-puppeting. How is it unrelated? I am surprised that you call me as a Korean nationalist, while you are the one who is trying very hard to give an impression that the Japanese are just the descendants of Koreans and Chinese. Related does not mean the "Same". As the Japanese share many in common, Ainu and Jomon have to be included as "related" Serial 06:40, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

That is not true, I added that they descend from both the Yayoi and Jōmon people. I deleted unrelated content about haplogroup D. You deleted several content which you seem to dislike. Look at the edit history of your changes. Again, a haplogroup does not make a people. The information about haplogroups can be found in the specific articles of haplogroups and not thrown into random articles about ethnic groups. Please refer to WP:Weight and WP:TOPIC.46.125.250.70 (talk) 06:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

First of all, I thought you are gonna call me as a "tochakwaegu(토착왜구)" lol, but it was a surprise. Look at Korean People article. There is also a mention of Haplogroup O-M716. You are the one who dislikes the words in Haplogroup D, because it doesn't show that the Japanese are the same as the Korean and the Chinese.Don't be too nationalistic. As a Korean, I love Koreans. But it's not cool trying hard to give a false impressions regarding our neighbour. Serial 06:51, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Another article is not an excuse. And there is a difference in deforming an article by replacing stable content with randomly copied content from haplogroup articles. This is disruptive and not good faith anymore.46.125.250.70 (talk) 07:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Trying to change the article using sock-puppets, and hiding under the IP address doesn't seem to be good faith. In addition, it's very self-centered way to say that my contents are "unrelated" just because you didn't like it. Serial 07:07, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, but accusing users with an different opinion to be "sockpuppets" is bad faith. Replacing content with haplogroup information is not constructive either. That is disruptive. What exactly do you not understand on that the information you removed and the content you added makes the article a mess. Why you can not use the talk page? This is on the border of vandalism.46.125.250.70 (talk) 07:11, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

And start using your real user name! You are Jejuminjok, but here you change your name to "Serial".46.125.250.70 (talk) 07:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

I actually don't know how to write my name on talk page, as this is very first time writing here. I wrote User Talk and then JejuMinjok, but it automatically shows Serial. Regarding this part, I am wrong. Sorry about that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jejuminjok (talk • contribs) 07:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Well, it seems we have reached a consensus. Thank you.46.125.250.70 (talk) 08:14, 25 March 2021 (UTC)