User talk:King007ofrock

Speedy deletion of "Just Friends (triple Trouble song)"

A page you created, Just Friends (triple Trouble song), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a band or other musical group, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for musical groups in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. WadeSimMiser (talk) 01:03, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dont Forget(Demi Lovato)

A tag has been placed on Dont Forget(Demi Lovato) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DougsTech (talk) 02:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Lines, Vines and Trying Times, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Narcotics (talk) 04:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Lines, Vines and Trying Times. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Narcotics (talk) 02:20, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Lines, Vines and Trying Times. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please see the articles talk page to discuss the edits you've been making. Thank You Narcotics (talk) 03:43, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your additions to Lines, Vines and Trying Times were reverted over and over. The site you are 'referring' to has been blacklisted, and for a reason. Moreover, reinserting that is a form of edit warring which is NOT productive. Hence:

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 55 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 16:29, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Lines, Vines and Trying Times. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Rockin56 (talk) 01:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Do you have reliable sources for this [1] or any of this [2] ? You need to start providing reliable sources in your edits or it may lead to a block. - eo (talk) 16:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Pokerdance (talk) 01:20, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lines, Vines and Trying Times, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Pokerdance (talk/contribs) 21:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Camp Rock (soundtrack). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pokerdance ^{(talk/contribs)} 04:30, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Camp Rock (soundtrack). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pokerdance ^{(talk/contribs)} 04:42, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Jonas Brothers discography, you will be blocked from editing. Pokerdance ^{(talk/contribs)} 02:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jonas Brothers, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Pokerdance ^{(talk/contribs)} 19:52, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not assume ownership of articles such as Jonas Brothers. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. This warning is moreso regarding what you wrote on the talk page asking no one to change anything, than what you contributed to the article. Pokerdance ^{(talk/contribs)} 14:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Jonas Brothers World Tour 2009

I have nominated Jonas Brothers World Tour 2009, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonas Brothers World Tour 2009. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Gosox5555 (talk) 18:55, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:19, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Edits

First of all, you cannot block me as you are not an admin. Second of all, even if you were to report me, I'm not doing anything wrong. You need to calm down, take a breather, and assume good faith. Pokerdance ^{(talk/contribs)} 20:05, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:jonas Brothers Acting

I will move it to an appropriate section in the article. Sourced information does not need to be removed. And for future reference, leave new messages at the bottom of talk pages. Pokerdance ^{(talk/contribs)} 20:12, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Jonas Brothers. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Newportm (talk) 03:09, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

For one week, for incivility and threats at User talk:Pokerdance. Enigma^msg 14:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Talk:Lines, Vines and Trying Times has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Schnitzel MannGreek. 17:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Lines, Vines and Trying Times. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Schnitzel MannGreek. 17:30, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lines, Vines and Trying Times

Please stop adding a Gold certification with the Jonas Brothers MySpace blog as a source. That is not a reliable source. Go to the chart's website and source that instead. If you keep adding this with unreliable sources, it will continue to be reverted. Pokerdance ^{(talk/contribs)} 17:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Pokerdance. Schnitzel MannGreek. 17:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 18:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Submarine 11 (soundtrack)

A tag has been placed on Submarine 11 (soundtrack) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Clubmarx (talk) 20:16, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Phineas and Ferb

The notability of the episode articles you recently created has been questioned at Talk:Phineas and Ferb#Episode articles. Fences&Windows 21:20, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phineas and Ferb's Musical Cliptastic Countdown for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phineas and Ferb's Musical Cliptastic Countdown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phineas and Ferb's Musical Cliptastic Countdown until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JDDJS (talk) 21:50, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ITunes Live from SoHo (Jonas Brothers EP) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ITunes Live from SoHo (Jonas Brothers EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITunes Live from SoHo (Jonas Brothers EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Status (talk · contribs) 12:52, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]