User talk:Kinderlander

Santiago traincrash

You've removed the table containing info about the train formation because in your opinion it isn't necesary. I don't see why because the many requests at the talk page to clarify this issue and the request for reliable sources for this. By removing the table the sources left are soft sources from the press and video and there isn't one left regarding the train formation and vehicle types involved. What is the point, accurate info or just keeping the debate about the formation ongoing ? --JB63 (talk) 20:33, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Indian general election, 2014 that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 06:06, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected it --Kinderlander (talk) 06:12, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also you have been told before in edit summary to discuss this. In the previous discussion this was decided against, if you want to restore it get consensus first! [1]Lihaas (talk) 16:17, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

warning

Your recent editing history at Christian terrorism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Per WP:BRD please raise your concerns on the Talk page of the article for discussion. thanks. Jytdog (talk) 15:48, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]