User talk:Kimberyann234

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Kimberyann234! Your additions to Wiley Cash have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 01:40, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you discospinster but can you please stop removing it Kimberyann234 (talk) 01:43, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We cannot have images on Wikipedia that are copyrighted to others, unless we have their permission. This is a legal issue. ... discospinster _talk 01:51, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry suspected

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Liamb2011. Thank you. Harobouri ^{T • C (he/him)} 03:31, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Liamb2011 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Liamb2011. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. firefly ( t · c ) 11:43, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kimberly Arnette Parsons

Hello, Kimberyann234. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kimberly Arnette Parsons, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kimberly Arnette Parsons

Hello, Kimberyann234. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kimberly Arnette Parsons".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kimberyann234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here Kimberyann234 (talk) 00:27, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's about more than that. Alleged sockpuppetry, for one. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:26, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Don't forget to insert your own reason to replace "Insert

I was blocked for editing a Wikipedia page. All I did was edit a Wikipedia page that's all I did Can I be unblocked please Kimberyann234 (talk) 00:27, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kimberyann234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason hereKimberyann234 (talk) 20:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a reason to unblock you- it indicates where your reason should go. If you intend your statement below as your reason- that is far from sufficient. You need to tell us what you have done wrong and what you will change. 331dot (talk) 20:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was blocked from editing Wikipedia pages I understand what was wrong with my Wikipedia account and I promise not to vandalize it ever again Kimberyann234 (talk) 20:13, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

I understand that your reason here is not a reason to unblock me. I understand what was wrong and I promise this will all be changed Kimberyann234 (talk) 20:32, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kimberyann234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:51, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What I have done wrong has been a sock

puppet. I promise I will change everything and I promise not to be a sock puppet ever again

Kimberyann234 (talk) 20:36, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn how to write an unblock request. WP:GAB explains how to do so. Nothing here is remotely convincing. --Yamla (talk) 21:51, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]