User talk:Kim2daKay

Just me.. I'm willing to learn and work hard.. for the sake of knowledge ★Kay (talk) 22:37, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Let me offer you some help

I think what you are trying to do here at Wikipedia is a good thing. I do think that you are making some honest mistakes, and these mistakes are going to slow down the good work you are trying to do. While reading up on policies and such isn't very exciting, I am very confident that if you read a few first, it would drastically help you in making edits that will stick around, avoid deletion issues, and let you spend more time adding content, instead of spending time defending it.

WP:RS is a the general policy on what is a reliable source, and what isn't. Obviously, The Korea Times, the New York Times and major papers are reliable sources. Blogs are not (there are a few exceptions, but they are very, very few). Small outfits like hallyu are likely not going to pass the "professionally vetted" test either. You should avoid using blogs and these secondary type sites as references because they will get removed. Same with Twitter, Facebook, Myspace, etc. References from these sites are not reliable. Technically, anyone can create an account on those sites, claim they are someone they are not, and make a statement that is false, so we can't trust ANY "facts" from these sites.

WP:MUSIC is the guideline on 'notability as it applies to music'. Any time someone goes to an WP:AFD (Articles For Deletion) about a musician or album, this is the gold standard that applies to tell if the article subject is notable or not. The general policy about notability is also worth a glance, as it is the blanket guideline for all notability.

Wikipedia:Sandbox is a good place to experiment with creating articles as well, and you can create your own sandbox on your own page. As many as you want. I've been here forever, and this is how I still create new articles, as it lets me tweak it up, and even get someone else's opinion before I attempt to put it in main space. This makes it much less likely that someone will nominate the article after it has been up an hour.

Wikipedia:Copyrights is also worth a glance. You can't just take images from anywhere and upload them here, even if the owner told you that it was ok. There are strict rules about what you can and can not upload, and you have to always be completely straight forward about licensing. This is a very big deal. Same goes with text, you can't just copy and paste large chunks. You can do short passages if you attribute them correctly, like in album reviews, etc.

I can promise you that if you take an hour or two and get generally familiar with these policies, it will save you many, many hours in frustration within a week. I hope you take the time to read up on these policies, stick around, and become an important contributor around here. You seem to be interested in an area that is underserved on Wikipedia, and if you take the time to learn the ropes just a little, I'm confident you can make this a better encyclopedia.

Dennis Brown (talk) 15:14, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

When faced with a difficult task, you didn't take the easy way out and blame others. Instead, you improved yourself, and then Wikipedia. Your work in learning the basics and applying them to new articles is very impressive. You accomplished more in one day than most people do in months, due to your own determination and willingness to work hard and do things right. You taught me something as well, thank you. Dennis Brown (talk) 08:16, 5 November 2011 (UTC)