User talk:Kilternom

leave me a message here. Make sure you sign using ~~~~ Kilternom (talk) 05:41, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kilternom, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Kilternom! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to look at edits on IQ reference chart

I see the article IQ reference chart has been tagged for expert review since October 2012. As part of a process of drafting a revision of that article in my user sandbox, I am contacting all Wikipedians who have edited that article since early 2009 for whom I can find a user talk page.

I have read all the diffs of all the edits committed to the article since the beginning of 2009 (since before I started editing Wikipedia). I see the great majority of edits over that span have been vandalism (often by I.P. editors, presumably teenagers, inserting the names of their classmates in charts of IQ classifications) and reversions of vandalism (sometimes automatically by ClueBot). Just a few editors have referred to and cited published reliable sources on the topic of IQ classification. It is dismaying to see that the number of reliable sources cited in the article has actually declined over the last few years. To help the process of finding reliable sources for articles on psychology and related topics, I have been compiling a source list on intelligence since I became a Wikipedian in 2010, and I invite you to make use of those sources as you revise articles on Wikipedia and to suggest further sources for the source on the talk pages of the source list and its subpages. Because the IQ reference chart article has been tagged as needing expert attention for more than half a year, I have opened discussion on the article's talk page about how to fix the article, and I welcome you to join the discussion. The draft I have in my user sandbox shows my current thinking about a reader-friendly, well sourced way to update and improve the article. I invite your comments and especially your suggestions of reliable sources as the updating process proceeds. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 21:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rinat Timokhin

Hi, you nominated Rinat Timokhin article for speedy deletion. According to WP:NFOOTBALL: "Players who have appeared, and managers who have managed, in a fully professional league, will generally be regarded as notable." The list of fully professional leagues is maintained in WP:FPL and Russian First Division in which he plays is fully professional. I will be recreating the article.

Geregen2 (talk) 17:32, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm Qwyrxian. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Organization of Search Engine Optimization Professionals, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Nooth57 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rs chen 7754 10:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]