User talk:Killz Gough

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Killz Gough! Thank you for your contributions. I am CAPTAIN RAJU and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or place {{helpme}} on your talk page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Since you've shown some interest in editing topics related to Bangladesh, we hope you'll stay and add content to Bangladesh related articles. A number of important articles related to Bangladesh are yet to be created and many of the existing ones are in poor shape. You can help improve the encyclopedia by becoming a regular editor and adhering to the policies of Wikipedia. Consider joining or watchlisting Bangladesh related discussions (for example, Noticeboard for Bangladesh-related topics).

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:17, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Santadas Kathiababa, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:11, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Santadas Kathiababa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Santadas Kathiababa, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 06:18, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Santadas Kathiababa. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you putting page needed tags in an article again and again? Please try to improve this article Killz Gough (talk) 06:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a red box at the top of the screen when you edit Santadas Kathiababa. This is there because User:0xDeadbeef protected "Santadas Kathiababa": Persistent sock puppetry ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 07:19, 27 November 2023)^[1] Since the page require autoconfirmed or confirmed access, there is also a {{pp-sock|small=yes}} tag that was added by User:0xDeadbeef.^[2] Please do not remove that tag whilst it is valid.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you putting page needed tags in an article again and again? Please try to improve this article Killz Gough (talk) 08:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Santadas Kathiababa#Using books as references.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You should link the references and pages in this book correctly. Please help improve this article. Killz Gough (talk) 08:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why does a Google search for this article not show the Wikipedia article? Help improve this article. Killz Gough (talk) 08:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot think of any reason why it would show it.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:43, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Srabanta_Deb per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Srabanta Deb. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 17:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]