User talk:Kilcock

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Good Charlotte has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will ^(talk) 02:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained revert at Chile

It is usual to write an edit summary, and to have a very good reason for entirely reverting someone's large edit. I see that you've reinstated breaches of the style guides, inter alia. Why? Tony (talk) 16:50, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chile

I don't have the means or knowledge to issue an official warning, but please quit making unconstructive edits to Chile that blatantly differ from the cited material. You have been asked multiple times to discuss your edits and provide proper sourcing on the articles talk page. Thank you. Cmiych (talk) 14:35, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

--PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:15, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]