User talk:Kikiha

June 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Max Nivelli, from its old location at User:Kikiha/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 22:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Wiae, thanks for letting me know. Kiki (talk) 05:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Max Nivelli (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article must be built from information found in third-party sources (newspapers, magazines) that are independent of the subject of the article. Those sources must be referenced in-line with the text they support. No un-referenced material is allowed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Nivelli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 20:14, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LaMona Hi, thank you for the message. This is the first time I have submitted a page for review in the English Wikipedia, until now I have submitted only on Hebrew Wiki and there the procedure is different. All my facts are substantiated, of course. I will add the footnotes and resubmit. 86.86.33.58 (talk) 20:50, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kikiha, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 20:14, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LaMona Hi, thank you for the message. This is the first time I have submitted a page for review in the English Wikipedia, until now I have submitted only on Hebrew Wiki and there the procedure is different. All my facts are substantiated, of course. I will add the footnotes and resubmit. Kiki (talk) 21:03, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Max Nivelli has been accepted

Max Nivelli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 17:22, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you LaMona for your feedback and approval of my article. I noticed you have also made a few improvements - so, thanks. I will now add the final touch of adding a picture and categories....and on to the next article. Kiki (talk) 18:19, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Abraham Polak) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Abraham Polak, Kikiha!

Wikipedia editor Scope creep just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Need an image, if possible.

To reply, leave a comment on Scope creep's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

scope_creep (talk) 23:10, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks scope_creep for your comment. I'm working on uploading an image for this page. Kiki 16:31, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Max Nivelli

He was a German film producer, but he was also a script writer, and he was from Berlin , at least in his film career. And he was in other occupations related to the film industry. That's why I thought Film people from Berlin seemed to be the most appropriate. But categorisation is not an exact science. Its a matter of judgement. Feel free to disagree. We could even establish Film producers from Berlin because there are probably enough for their own category here - though I dont think there would be for any other German cities. Rathfelder (talk) 15:00, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the quick reply. This is all true but during his years in the film business, he was mainly a producer so I think that the category of German Film Producers should definitely be included as well. Kiki 15:37, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Your signature

Hi. According to WP:CUSTOMSIG, custom signatures must contain at least one link to the user's user or talk pages, which yours does not, making extra steps necessary for people to respond to you. You can solve this by going to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-personal, finding the Signature section about half-way down the page, and un-checking the "Treat the above as wiki markup ..." checkbox. This causes the entry in the Signature field above to be displayed as your name, but still links it to your correct user page so others can easily get to it. Alternatively (and somewhat better IMO), if you clear out the Signature field, it will simply use your username so there is no confusion between it and the displayed name. Thanks. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 19:41, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for this input - I appreciate it, I wasn't aware of that. I changed my signature accordingly and I hope now it displays as required. Let me know if there is anything further. [[User:Kikiha|Kikiha]] ([[User talk:Kikiha|talk]]) (talk) 20:02, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid it looks even more confusing now, with wikicode being rendered as part of it. I'd suggest simply blanking out the signature field at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-personal so it uses the default signature. Thanks. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 08:54, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

O.k. thanks, I've blanked it out, hope this finally works. Kikiha (talk) 09:34, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see, yes it did.

—[AlanM1 (talk)]— 06:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for not giving up on me

. Kikiha (talk) 07:48, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Kikiha! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Contacting another wiki editor regarding a revision to a page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pathways of Life (1918) (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Per WP:NF.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pathways of Life (1918) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pathways of Life (1918), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 02:51, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pathways of Life (1918 film)

Hello, Kikiha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pathways of Life (1918 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]