User talk:Kid from theblock

Welcome!

Hello, Kid from theblock, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Silent Note, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 01:57, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Silent Note

A tag has been placed on Silent Note requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Drmies (talk) 01:57, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Silent Note

A tag has been placed on Silent Note requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --moreno oso (talk) 02:06, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Silent Note

A tag has been placed on Silent Note requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 18:06, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Silent Note. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:08, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.

Based on your recent edits, you may want to take a look at WP:GARAGE. — Timneu22 · talk 18:06, 30 July 2010 (UTC) — Timneu22 · talk 18:06, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Timneu22 · talk 18:08, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Timneu22 · talk 18:13, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your block coming soon

First, please read WP:GARAGE. Topics on Wikipedia must be notable. There is no indication on the page you have created that it is at all notable. Notability means reliable sources and significant third-party coverage. Your article does not have that. To make things worse, you continue to remove the speedy deletion tags and you claim on the talk page "I'm still working on it." Frankly, this is irrelevant; it seems clear that this is a promotional page about some band that isn't significant, and therefore the speedy deletion tags must remain in place. Go ahead and remove them again, it is sure to get you blocked. — Timneu22 · talk 18:15, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of one week, for persistent disruptive editing, culminating in removing all content from User talk:Timneu22 and posting a personal attack. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:22, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Silent Note

A tag has been placed on Silent Note requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --moreno oso (talk) 01:08, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Silent Note, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --moreno oso (talk) 01:11, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:18, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Get-Up

A tag has been placed on The Get-Up requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 01:21, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Based on this edit, you may want to take a look at WP:GARAGE. — Timneu22 · talk 01:22, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kid from theblock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what is the reason for my deletion?

Decline reason:

As it says on the eleven warnings on this talk page, you are blocked for repeatedly creating articles that do not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria, wasting administrator time in repeatedly deleting them. As you do not understand the reason for your block, you are certain to repeat it if you are unblocked, so an unblock would not be appropriate at this time. Wait out your block, and when you return in two weeks, make sure you've read the rules. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:26, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Silent Note

Note: I am copying your comment from my talk page to here, as the original will have been archived before your block ends, so you may never see my answer if I post it there. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:15, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help the article Silent Note that it wont get deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kid from theblock (talk • contribs) 01:10, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's too late, it's been deleted. More importantly, though, I can find no evidence that the subject of the article satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines, so I would not have helped to protect it from deletion anyway. Four different long-established and experienced Wikipedia editors have flagged the article for deletion as not indicating the significance of its subject, and four different administrators have assessed the flagging, and on the basis of their assessment have deleted the article. Perhaps you have finally got the point by now. Incidentally, edits like this and this are likely to get you blocked indefinitely if you continue. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:15, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

but its true

Your saying so simply makes it clear that you haven't yet read the notability criteria. That's a rule you do have to read and understand, or you'll simply be blocked again. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:28, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]