User talk:Kiatdd/Archive 1

The sections on Ijaz

The edits were lost in a fit of vandalism. I have done nothing but to restore them. Kindly discuss this on the talk page. I have started a new topic there. ---~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.68.169.92 (talk) 19:31, 15 June 2013 (UTC) I replied to your comment in your talk page.Kiatdd (talk) 18:22, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Many thanks for the contributions. A couple of useful resources are WP:MEDRS and WP:MEDMOS. Drop me a note if you have any questions. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your talk page please reply on mine) 15:12, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Wikimedia commons labelled the picture a case of "sterile non ulcerative keratitis". Is this incorrect? Also thanks for the pyuria catch, wasn't thinking. This is in regard to diffuse lamellar keratitis. 213.232.200.195 (talk) 20:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanking from AsceticRose

Do you really think my edits are excellent? Anyway, thank you for your appreciation. −AsceticRosé 15:55, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from Mdscottis - cataract

Your edits have transformed 'cataract'. The process actually works! Thank you. --Mdscottis (talk) 18:37, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the citation numbers. I'm not sure if you intended to remove them or not, or place book references in a different section. I can certainly revert if that is what you intended. --Mdscottis (talk) 22:53, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: AsceticRose

Thank you for your reply. Actually, when I started editing Muhammad in Islam, i did not have any fixed planning. But now I see we should have some planning about the contents of this page. I'm exchanging views with another user on this issue. We need discussion on the take page for a better result. You're also welcome. Yes the bio is covered in Muhammad article, but I like to present it according to Islamic traditions.--AsceticRosé ^talk 05:33, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

template

Hi, I have seen that you keep on revering template on Jesus in Islam. I have provided the sources earlier as well on the talk page and still i can provide the sources.Please kindly clarify what is the problem in it if the things are sourced you can not raise questions on it. --Ibrahim ebi (talk) 10:37, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One of the problems with the templates is that they include "content". "Content" belongs in the article space so that anyone can edit and see the changes each time they are edited. Kiatdd (talk) 10:50, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i have removed the content. Hope now there will be no such problem. --Ibrahim ebi (talk) 11:08, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see no problem in template:Isa and as you know its talk page is useful, because we do not have time to discuss it all over again. Kiatdd (talk) 11:33, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On your request i have removed the contents and now there are only links. There is no problem in the template now and i hope you are too satisfied with it. --Ibrahim ebi (talk) 11:50, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GOD

I think you have missed my point. I was talking about the total probability of all such events in the whole of world population since the time of our creation. And, perhaps that could be expanded even further to the all probability of all events since the big bang leading towards appearance of solar system, the earth, life and humans. And, it could have been expanded even more further, past big bang to the moment of the creation of everything. And, in case there wasn't such a point but everything is eternal than its definately absolutely one divided by infinity, which isn't zero but almost zero. Ryanspir (talk) 23:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reply. Replied in my talk page. Ryanspir (talk) 15:37, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kiatdd. You have new messages at Underlying lk's talk page.
Message added 19:27, 15 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

eh bien mon prince (talk) 19:27, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kiatdd! You're right, I won't be editing those templates again for now, until there are more comments on the situation. About choosing which templates should be kept or deleted, I nominated some of them already, the discussion can be found here. Thanks for the heads-up about the calligraphic image, I changed it to the right one now! Cheers, eh bien mon prince (talk) 18:13, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From AsceticRosé

Hi Kiatdd, hope you are well. You have not yet said what you were thinking about my comments! --AsceticRosé ^talk 17:36, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your valuable reply. But don't you think that some of the biographic info (like the causes of battles, latter Islamic social reforms), about which there are different views between Muslim and non-Muslim sources, can also be included in this article from Muslim perspective? And what about sections like Muhammad in the Quran and Muhammad and the Quran?--AsceticRosé ^talk 04:13, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Advice required

Sorry to disturb you once again! In Muhammad in Islam article, the texts in section Notable early events should come under some headlines. But I'm not sure about the names of the headlines. I've thought of "Orphanhood, a divine plan" for the second para, "God's protection" (combining the third para and the lower text of the first para), and "Early sign of Prophethood" for the last para. What do you think? Also, the section name "Notable early events" should also be changed to "Youth" or "Early Years". Which one do you prefer? --AsceticRosé ^talk 13:32, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support. But you people should better discuss these type of proposals at article's talk. Faizan (talk) 13:58, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reply from AsceticRose

1st message: yes, they may look like that, but they are coming under the section "Muslim account of Muhammad", and not directly. You see, in article like Moses in Islam, there are sections like "Test of prophecy" and "Call to prophethood". Without sub-sections, the mother section will look vague.
2nd message: yes, you are right. Most of the wiki pages on Quran chapters are not only poor, but also filled with irrelevant info. They are written in bad style. They really need improvements. I like to do that but am busy with, you know, other article. --AsceticRosé ^talk 10:14, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad in Islam

Well, that article concerns with Muhammad in Islam,or with "Muslim account of Muhammad", So Muslim point of view should be presented there, and in this perspective, I agree with User:AsceticRose's Arguments. This Article should deal with only the Muslims' viewpoint about their Last Prophet! The article should deal with only Islamic traditions about the Prophet. Your comments like "Another example is the theory that Muhammad suffered from seizure attacks, this page can explain about these theories", is also heart-breaking and it may provide oil to the fire! We are not [[here, to discuss his health, we are here to just present Islamic viewpoint about the Last Prophet. Hope you got it.... Faizan (talk) 13:56, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: proposal about suras

I think, the issue you raised is very complex. I’ve the following observation.

First of all the interpretation of Quran is very important. The interpretation of any sura (i.e. its verses) bears its significance. But as all wiki editors are not scholars, they are filling wiki pages with whatever they can write. But it does not legalize the exclusion of interpretation.
By “original text”, If you mean the Arabic text, then its inclusion into English pages will not lead to a very nice picture!
If you include original text and two translations, can you imagine the size of pages?
Your suggestion of including only the first few verses (or selected verses) for long suras may create serious problems. For long suras, first few verses may not be the most important parts. About selected verses, there may be disagreement.
I think we can start improving these pages like other articles, without setting any structure, because such a structure may be hard to be agreed upon.
After all, these are my views only. These may be insufficient.--AsceticRosé ^talk 15:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kiatdd. You have new messages at AsceticRose's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--AsceticRosé 08:45, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Hello, Kiatdd. You have new messages at AsceticRose's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--AsceticRosé 14:21, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The Articles for Creation barnstar
		In recognition to your extensive contributions in the field of Ophthalmology --AsceticRosé 17:10, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanking you!

Thanking you for showing me the right way in editing Muhammad in Islam --AsceticRosé 17:44, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request re: changes you made to Alpins method of astigmatism analysis

I posted a version of this also on my talk page:

Kiatdd, I just noticed that you deleted all reference to Alpins method of astigmatism analysis in the corneal topography section. As I noted in response to your note on my talk page, the entire entry is inadequate, and the Alpins section sticks out only because it talks about that one aspect of corneal topography. Were the entry to be expanded and referenced appropriately, Alpins would appear as only a minor section. And it is not advertising; it is mathematics, which is used daily by ophthalmic surgeons around the world. I ask that you reverse your decision to delete. Thank you. Kcroes (talk) 16:58, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Same rationale applies to Astigmatism (eye) as above. It makes no sense to describe ocular astigmatism without mention of state-of-the-art methods of measuring and analyzing (using approach adopted by the American National Standards Institute. Kcroes (talk) 17:05, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please know that I'd be happy to shorten the passages in question as opposed to throwing the baby out with the bath water. Kcroes (talk) 17:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of companions

Kiatdd thanks for leaving me the message:

Hi Johnleeds1, this page:List of Sahabah seems neglected, somebody created a template of companions template:Sahabah mentioning 280 names, the page list of sahabah is just a mess, what's your suggestion?

I would say that like the other pages about Islam on Wikipedia it needs improving. Unfortunately Mohammad's companions are being classed as Sunni or Shia in this article even though Sunni and Shia did not exist during the time of Muhammad and they classed them selves as following the religion of Abraham and classed them selves a Muslim. Other articles are even worst --Johnleeds1 (talk) 20:48, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of tafsir works may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:28, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, I'll fix them.Kiatdd (talk) 18:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of translations of the Quran may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kiatdd. You have new messages at Talk:Ayah.
Message added 23:00, 19 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Wahj-asSaif (talk) 23:10, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kiatdd. You have new messages at Wahj-asSaif's talk page.
Message added 22:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

--Wahj-asSaif (talk) 22:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kiatdd. You have new messages at Wahj-asSaif's talk page.
Message added 22:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

--Wahj-asSaif (talk) 22:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kiatdd. You have new messages at AsceticRose's talk page.
Message added 13:51, 12 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

AsceticRosé 13:51, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kiatdd. You have new messages at AsceticRose's talk page.
Message added 10:45, 14 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

AsceticRosé 10:45, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eid Greetings

Happy EID MUBARAK. Hope this Eid will bring you a lot of joy and happiness. --AsceticRosé 06:26, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sura

Sorry about this edit. I didn't mean to remove your edits. I was only intending to remove the spam. I must have opened the page and completely missed that you had worked on it after the IP. Sorry again. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 19:54, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad's first revelation

I think the article still needs some work like addition/removal of some content, dividing the text into sections etc. Some contents that were removed might be useful. I'm going to take a short wikibreak. After that, I intend to work on it. Thanks. -AsceticRosé 04:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hadith's of the prophet Mohammed sallalahu alayhi we sellem

Esselamu aleikum we rahmetullah brother

Do you know what hadith means? Why did u revert my edits when they are not in discrepancy with the etymology, i have translated the word....... the word doesn't mean "tradition" ok? There's another word in arabic which means tradition. What business do you have editing islam topics you not being muslim, and if you are muslim how can you not know what hadith is........ so please go edit some athiest posts.... now if u are muslim go get a hadith book and leanr what it is and quit spreading lies about tradition, ok? If you keep spreading this lie may God break your leg... thankx... are you afraid?~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeputyBob (talk • contribs) 17:58, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry, I should have explained first in your talk page before reverting you.Kiatdd (talk) 19:26, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Al-Burooj may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of Christians by Dhu Nawas in Yaman, persecutions by Nebuchadnezzar, and the battle of trench.<<ref>{{cite book|last=Ali|first=Maulana Muhammad|title=English Translation of the Holy Quran. With
title=The Qur'an : an encyclopedia|year=2008|publisher=Routledge|isbn=9-78-0-415-32639-1|page=346 (By Stefan Wild}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok!Kiatdd (talk) 19:26, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again

Hi Kiatdd, how are you? In the article Fatimah, an unusual image is being inserted. We have a discussion regarding it in the talk-page. Can you please have your view on it here? -AsceticRosé 16:00, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad's views on slavery

Hello, Kiatdd. You have new messages at AsceticRose's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi Kiatdd, sorry for late response. I was in a fix as to how to start cleaning in this article. I have started a discussion on the article's talk-page, and pointed out the problems. Please participate. Thanks. -AsceticRosé 15:03, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kiatdd, thanks for your comment. I have made some copy-edit there. But there are other problems in the article and we need some sort of agreement to fix them. Will you please talk a look at the talk? And thanks for your nice edit in Muhammad article. -AsceticRosé 04:27, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Esoteric interpretation of the Quran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hafiz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of suras in the Quran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Hud, Al-Fajr, Qaf, Maryam, Nuh and Quraysh

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unverifiable content

I noticed you have deleted content from various suras. While the intention might have been good, you are supposed to add a "citation-needed tag" as an interim step before outright deletion if the material is easily verifiable. In some cases I can confirm it was easily verifiable. Please keep this in mind in the future. Thanks. Pass a Method talk 20:16, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unverifiable content, and sadly in sura pages crappy content, can be deleted on the spot. Another issue is that they are chapters of the Quran and not dump grounds for weird interpretations. Kiatdd (talk) 20:37, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Angelika Neuwirth

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Kiatdd, thanks for creating Angelika Neuwirth!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:35, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation join the new Physiology Wikiproject!

Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.

Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with {{WikiProject Physiology|class=|importance=}} with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
- {{subst:WP Physiology–invite}} ~~~~
To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
- {{subst:WP Physiology–welcome}} ~~~~
You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.

Hoping for your cooperation! Diptanshu^Talk 12:49, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

please help translate this message into the local language

	The Cure Award
	In 2013 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you so much for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date medical information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do!

We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award)

Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation