User talk:Khozman
September 2011
[edit]
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. [1] MER-C 08:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Banckle Reference Reverted
[edit]@MER-C, For the recent reverts; I would like to share that Banckle offers a suite of collaborative tools and like DimDim and other web conferencing alternatives; Banckle Online Meeting is one of its web based tool for conducting web conferencing sessions that comes with a free API as well to help developers creating new applications by borrowing some of its features. Since this page section List_of_collaborative_software correspond exactly with Banckle Online Meeting and the listed tools DimDim and Zimbra are its competitors so I added Banckle to that list. Please visit this blog page as a reference and read out a head-to-head features comparison of Banckle Online Meeting with DimDim. Please make sure that by referencing Banckle Online Meeting, promotion or other marketable benefits were not intended. The mentioning was made just for the sake of awareness that Banckle offer the same free API as an alternative solution for conducting Online Meetings, Live Chats and File Sharings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khozman (talk • contribs) 00:35, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
While we appreciate your attempt to improve the article List of tools for static code analysis, according to Wikipedia's guidelines for standalone lists, the only entries that should appear are ones which have their own articles on Wikipedia. We've therefore reverted your changes. If you feel the tool you added meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria, please consider writing an article for it first and then add it to the list. —Psychonaut (talk) 13:03, 20 April 2012 (UTC)