User talk:Khorazmiy

Welcome

Hello, Khorazmiy, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

October 2020

Hello, I'm BrownHairedGirl. An edit that you recently made to Sogdian warriors seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edit was unsourced and unexplained. It broke categories and templates. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:32, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Khwarazm

Please read Wikipedia:Common names. The region is not known as 'Khorezm', it's Khwarazm. Also please read Wikipedia:Copyrights and WP:CIR as well, thanks. --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --HistoryofIran (talk) 01:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I put in the article all reliable sources, but you deleted all the text without discussion. Follow the rules of wikipedia and discuss the text without deletion it.Khorazmiy (talk) 01:42, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Two editors are telling you that it is not WP:RS. If you are so well-versed in the rules, you wouldn't have 1. added them 2. kept edit warring. Instead, you would have taken this to the talk page and try to reach WP:CONSENSUS. Not to mention you are still ignoring WP:COMMON NAME, it is Khwarazm, not Khorezm. --HistoryofIran (talk) 01:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- I changed already it to Khwarazm, but you still trying to delete text with sources. Could you be so kind to discuss this issue on the page of the article Khwarazm.Khorazmiy (talk) 01:46, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Changing it to Khwarazm still doesn't change the fact that the sources aren't WP:RS. I will take a look at it. --HistoryofIran (talk) 01:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- As I see it, you decided to become the main judge of Wikipedia in determining which source is reliable and important and which is not. The importance and credibility of sources is determined by discussion. There are Wikipedia rules that you probably don't know Khorazmiy (talk) 01:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid nonsensical accusations like these, that is if you want to have an actual discussion, thanks. --HistoryofIran (talk) 02:34, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- - Give arguments, according to Wikipedia rules, that these sources are not reliable. Khorazmiy (talk) 11:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion topic

Why Did you delete the image ? Manbigg745 (talk) 09:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prove the authenticity of the photo. The ethnicity of people depicted on the photo is not supported by the reliable sources. Khorazmiy (talk) 18:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no other ethnicity pages attached with reliable sources for their ethnicity image however since you are the one who deleted the old image ( replace a new image ) Recommend it to be acceptable for all viewers Manbigg745 (talk) 05:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samarkand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkic Khaganate. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I need your help!

Good day colleague! Recently I wrote an article about Uzbeks in Turkey. As you know, it is very important to find reliable sources. Can't find sources, can you help me? ITPRO.UZ (talk) 15:21, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]