User talk:Khocon

Leave your messages here :)
Instructions: Select a new section & write your messages. Also you can send me direct emails to Md.khocon@live.com
I'm not a employee of Wikipedia , then you know i have other jobs to do , so you have to wait :)

Wikipedia Asian Month is COMING!

Hi Khocon ,

The Wikipedia Asian Month will begin in less than an hours, and once again, thank you for signing up! Let's help the world know more about Asia! Below are a few reminders for you:

Please check out the rules here. Some rules have been adjusted—the most important being that on the English Wikipedia, stubs may be expanded with some limitations.
Do take the time to read the Q&A if you have any questions, or ask on the talk page.
The list of participants has been alphabetized so you can more easily find your name and report your contributions.
There is a template that you can use on your user page. {{Template:User Asian Month‎}}

Enjoy the Wikipedia Asian Month :) --AddisWang (talk)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hi. Back when you were unblocked, you committed to meet the current Terms of Use by always disclosing paid editing jobs in the future. I see that you recently created Joshua Aaron, which is clearly paid editing. I do not wish to block your account, but if you do not abide by your commitment to disclose paid work I will need to reapply the block that was lifted. Can you make sure to disclose this article and your client, and to do so in all future cases of paid editing. - Bilby (talk) 00:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i can make sure. Thanks Bilby.--Khocon (talk) 04:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re this issue, see {{connected contributor (paid)}}, just FYI. 220 of ^Borg 06:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Khocon, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SmartSE (talk) 21:28, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pat Divilly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Stunt (3rd nomination). While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea about it. Thanks.-Khocon (talk) 20:27, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geoffrey Trachtenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berkeley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Harrison Carroll (magician)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Harrison Carroll (magician), Khocon!

Wikipedia editor Prof tpms just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

We need the photograph of the magician here.

Thank you sir. Okay, i'm looking for a CC Photo. --Khocon (talk) 10:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of three months for ongoing non-disclosure of paid editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bilby (talk) 02:24, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Khocon. Unfortunately, you don't appear to have met the terms of your unblock some months ago, and thus I am reimposing the three month block that was originally placed. In spite of reminders and your promise to abide by the disclosure requirements, it is clear that you have continued to engage in undisclosed paid editing. While I would have much preferred to have seen you disclose your conflicts of interest and continue to edit, the ongoing lack of disclosure remains an issue. - Bilby (talk) 02:27, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bilby, I did disclosed some of my works.Not my all edit contributions are paid. For some works i never get paid. I did not spams or participated in any kind of Edit war. I admit, i never updated my COI list. Please sir, unblock me.

I'm trying to learn and follow Wikipedia guidelines. I'm not an expert. I would like to learn. Requesting you to unblock me. Next time, i'll update my COI list regularly. Khocon (talk) 03:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wish things had worked out differently. But you had eight months to start disclosing paid editing, per the agreement, and you only managed it without prompting once. At some point we need to make a call about whether or not you are going to abide by the Terms of Use. It seems that eight months is long enough to make that determination. - Bilby (talk) 23:00, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BilbyI'll abide by the rules. I repeat, please unblock me sire. Give me another chance. Let me update my list. --Khocon (talk) 06:41, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but you were given another chance when you were unblocked eight months ago. I have only reinstated the original block, though - thus it is only a 3 month block, not indefinite. - Bilby (talk) 23:34, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bilby how am i gonna survive? I'm a student. Wikipedia is my part time job. I contributed on many pages. It's upto you sire. --Khocon (talk) 06:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are always welcome to ask for an independent review of the block - the instructions are above. If someone decides to unblock you that's their call, and I won't oppose it. But again, you were given eight months to demonstrate that you could abide by your agreement, and didn't. - Bilby (talk) 15:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khocon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I disclosed some of my works which were paid editing. Please tell me is paid editing forbidden? Khocon (talk) 07:19, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You already know the rules on paid editing, because you agreed to them the last time you were unblocked - and then repeatedly failed to follow them. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:09, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Just as an additional observation, on your user page you do state that you are paid to edit. You also list some articles you created, and you list some articles where you have a conflict of interest. But you do not actually say which articles you were paid to edit and who paid you, and you do not identify the clients.

You have already been shown Template:Connected contributor (paid), which clearly says "The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see Paid-contribution disclosure."

The Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure page explains in more detail, and there's an example at Talk:Assurant showing how that template is used.

There is also an example of an acceptable declaration of paid editing at User:FacultiesIntact where the editor says "I also do paid work on Wikipedia, and will declare projects on which I have COI to the right. I'm contracted by StellaResults, a small consulting firm." and then has a table of articles they were paid to edit and names each client they were edited for.

The Wikimedia Foundation takes paid editing very seriously, and editors don't get many chances to come back from failure to disclose. In this case I think you are fortunate that Bilby only reimposed a three-month block, especially as you have ignored reminders even after you were released from your previous block. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note - I've had to reset this for another three months due to recent block evasion. - Bilby (talk) 02:40, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ExpoMarketing

The article ExpoMarketing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ORG. The citations that look to be to reliable sources are actually press releases. Plenty of ghits, but I'm not seeing sufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ExpoMarketing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ExpoMarketing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ExpoMarketing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joshua Aaron for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joshua Aaron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Aaron until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mar11 (talk) 09:57, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation from Wikipedia Asian Month 2016

Wikipedia Asian Month

Thanks for partipating Wikipedia Asian Month last year, and I hope you enjoy it. Last year, more than 7,000 articles contribute to Wikipedia in 43 languages in Wikipedia Asian Month, making us one of the largest event on Wikipedia. We will organize this event again in upcoming November, and would like to invite you join us again.

This year, we are lowering down the standards that you only need to create 4 (Four) articles to receive a postcard (new design), and articles only need to be more than 3,000 bytes and 300 words. We are also improving our postcard sending process, e.g. making the postcards right now, and collecting the address after the event ends without waiting other languges.

Wikipedians who create the most articles on each Wikipedia will be honored as "Wikipedia Asian Ambassadors". We will send you both digital copy, and a paper copy of the Ambassador certificate.

Sign up now

Thank you for considering! --AddisWang (talk)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing? Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Heller (2nd nomination)

Hello. I saw that you !voted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Heller (2nd nomination) minutes after another SPA !voted as well. I am curious to know if you were paid for !voting. If you were, please declare you paid contributions and be open about it. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 19:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was not a paid editing. :) --Khocon (talk)

Welcome to Wikipedia Asian Month!

Hi there! Wikipedia Asian Month is about to start. Here is some information about participating in the event:

Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Best Wishes, Addis Wang
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Khocon. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Widefox; talk 14:24, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joseph La Piana

The article Joseph La Piana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP with sourcing issues. WP:TOOSOON & promo (and paid editor hasn't disclosed on here)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox; talk 14:27, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. not disclosing per WP:COI / WP:PAID . Removing COI tag from COI articles. This is deceptive and the opposite of the disclosure you have to do to edit here. Without doing this disclosure you cannot edit here. Widefox; talk 14:51, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Widefox; talk 01:08, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Khocon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Eroadster

Hi Khocon, The page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Eroadster is live and has been updated with a citation (4) for the "going into production date". It is not a student project but is a very real ongoing project. The images that you see are CAD renders as there will not a prototype ready until about next May/June. Janoteki (talk) 10:04, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Asian Month 2017: Invitation to Participate

Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

Nomination of Fahim Rahim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fahim Rahim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fahim Rahim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-Samoht27 (talk) 16:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fahim Rahim

Hello, Khocon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fahim Rahim, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]