User talk:Kheynom

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:42, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding on where to place the HE statement for the Panther

I don't want to insist on this, but would it be more logic to place the lower HE potential in the sentence that speaks about tradeoffs, since after all that sentence tells that difference between the Tiger and Panther was that the Panther had less side armour, and the lower HE is another difference. I think it would be better suited to talk about the HE in the tradeoffs sentence rather than after the mention of long range combat. --MaxRavenclaw (talk) 20:14, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes its another tradeoff, but the current sentence mentioning how effective the Panther was in long range, and in contrary, it could not hold itself up, or was less effective against Infantry, due its less effective HE round at closer range. I think thats makes it pretty clear, or don't you think? Kheynom (talk) 12:39, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think the sentence held just fine all alone, but it's really a matter of taste, so I won't pursue the matter further. If you prefer it like this, I'm OK with it. --MaxRavenclaw (talk) 19:46, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wording of T34 edit

That's not like you Kheynom. The wording is well over the top. Irondome (talk) 19:17, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mate, the sentence was in about more than year untouched! Kheynom (talk) 19:22, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well I did'nt see it, and shit creeps in. Ive been worrying about the lede being screwed about with. Come on it does read seriously bloggy. Let's go over to talk Irondome (talk) 19:25, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I made a good faith revert of an IP edit, which made a even more poor wording. The sentence appear to be in since over a year, why it should be changed now? I don't want to engage in another pointless discussion just because an IP wanted to create unrest. Kheynom (talk) 19:35, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know it was good faith. But we can make it better than both. come on over to talk, ive started a section. Simon Irondome (talk) 19:37, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will leave my thoughts on it. Kheynom (talk) 19:51, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]