User talk:Khavakoz

Welcome!

Hello, Khavakoz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Rugby Flags

and again G~~ain~~Line ♠ _♥ 09:54, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

once more, I'm gonna presume you're watching my page after this. G~~ain~~Line ♠ _♥ 18:25, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ireland rugby union icon

Call for consensus/conclusion to current Ireland rugby union team icon

Hello, I am contacting you because you have been an active participant in the recent discussion on icon to be used for Ireland rugby union. I have tried to summarise the many strands and come to a conclusion based on what I perceive the consensus to be in this section - Summary of Ireland Flag discussion and suggested consensus conclusion. To move the issue to a conclusion I am asking all participants who have signed the discussion to read my summary and comment on the validity of the approach I have advocated, before the issue goes cold. I am keen that the enormous efforts of all contributors results in a tangible conclusion on this occasion.Kwib (talk) 16:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI closings

Unless you are an administrator, you shouldn't have closed that ANI report. GoodDay (talk) 16:27, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware that I'd closed it. I thought that was closed by Kudpung? Khavakoz (talk) 16:33, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, you K fellows look similar. PS - Don't forget to delete your post-close comments in that ANI report. GoodDay (talk) 16:37, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. I had entered my comments while the ANI was still open. As such I am permitted to have them retained in the report. The report was still open when I did my final preview, it appears Kudpung and I hit publish almost simultaneously.Khavakoz (talk) 16:45, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information

In the event you do not have the article talk page watch listed at Coins of Ireland: I've semi-protected the article due to edit warring. I'm cautioning all editors to seek a consensus here before editing the article with regard to this particular point. I'm taking this step to avoid blocks; however, blocks will be likely should the edit war continue without consensus. Tiderolls 22:03, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who hadn't edited the article, and merely posted in the talk page, I heartily support your actions. As I see matters, this matter escalated when one editor, instead of seeking consensus, opted instead to escalate the matter through brigading, escalating to an ANI without discussion, and edit warring. He's now making unsupported allegations of socking, and has chosen to do so in the Talk page where Consensus has been sought. Khavakoz (talk) 13:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]