User talk:Khaty2

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ginger Jolie has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Spencer^T♦^C 01:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your email re: Ginger Jolie

Hi there, I received your email stating that you're looking for someone to delete the article about Ginger Jolie. I've never edited that article before, and I suspect that you got a hold of me because I'm one of the first administrators in the alphabetical list of administrators.

To list an article for deletion, follow the process at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. For more one on one help, I'd suggest leaving a request on Talk:Ginger_Jolie. You'll probably get better results with that than you will emailing random administrators. Good luck! A Train^talk 02:03, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Ginger Jolie constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. - Icewedge (talk) 02:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, what can I say? You've piqued my interest. You're blanking the Ginger Jolie article, which constitutes vandalism at Wikipedia. I'm sorry that nobody's taken the time to write you a personal message and you're just getting these templates.

If you want to initiate a discussion to have the Ginger Jolie article removed, don't delete all the text in the article. Just follow the steps listed here: Wikipedia:AFD#How_to_list_pages_for_deletion. It should take you 10 minutes tops. A Train^talk 02:12, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since you did not complete the procedures as noted above, I have removed the partial AfD that you posted. However, I must say that if you were to complete it, it is unlikely that the article will be deleted because she is notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia due to her selection as a Penthouse Pet and your attempt at scrubbing her past history would not be looked favorably upon by other editors. I strongly recommend that you review the Business' FAQ before you edit her page again. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative paths

Take a look at this. It suggests an alternate path you might follow. David in DC (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And here's another. This one is probably your best bet, given the comments of high level editors in your AfD debate and on Jimbo's talk page. David in DC (talk) 16:16, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]